Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

NLHE Foundations Course #02: Hand Analysis

Results 1 to 46 of 46

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Here’s mine…
    This is a spot where I was considering a 4-bet bluff. Didn’t have enough hands on villain for any accurate read but he had 3-bet my steals a couple of times. For the sake of this exercise I’ll assume these stats are reliable.

    PokerStars - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players

    Hero (BTN): 146.5 BB
    SB (SB): 100 BB (VPIP: 22.86, PFR: 20.59, 3Bet Preflop: 16.67, Hands: 36)
    BB (BB): 142.5 BB (VPIP: 20.00, PFR: 20.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
    UTG (UTG): 85 BB (VPIP: 28.36, PFR: 17.91, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 71)
    CO (CO): 103.5 BB (VPIP: 21.26, PFR: 14.01, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 210)

    SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

    Dealt to Hero:
    Jd 6d

    fold, fold, Hero raises to 4 BB, SB raises to 13 BB, fold, Hero?


    3B% of 16. As he’s raising my BTN open I’ll assume the wider part of his 3B range which would look like:
    33+,A3s+,KTs+,A7o+ = 200 combos
    If I 4-bet in this situation this situation I would typically bet just under 3x his raise so I’m considering a 4bet of 35BB.
    I estimate he will continue against this raise with a range of:
    TT+ AQs+ AKo = 51 combos
    So He’s folding 149 combination of starting hands
    = Fold frequency of 0.75
    My raise makes the pot 54BB. 35/54 = 0.648
    0.648 < 0.75 so I’m going to conclude that a bluff in this spot is profitable?
    I know the range I’ve given him here is highly debateable given the small sample size and that most opponents will tighten up more than this to a 4-bet, but I just settled on these ranges to practice this week’s lesson.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by 1QDOG7 View Post
    Here’s mine…
    This is a spot where I was considering a 4-bet bluff. Didn’t have enough hands on villain for any accurate read but he had 3-bet my steals a couple of times. For the sake of this exercise I’ll assume these stats are reliable.

    PokerStars - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players

    Hero (BTN): 146.5 BB
    SB (SB): 100 BB (VPIP: 22.86, PFR: 20.59, 3Bet Preflop: 16.67, Hands: 36)
    BB (BB): 142.5 BB (VPIP: 20.00, PFR: 20.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
    UTG (UTG): 85 BB (VPIP: 28.36, PFR: 17.91, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 71)
    CO (CO): 103.5 BB (VPIP: 21.26, PFR: 14.01, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 210)

    SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

    Dealt to Hero:
    Jd 6d

    fold, fold, Hero raises to 4 BB, SB raises to 13 BB, fold, Hero?


    3B% of 16. As he’s raising my BTN open I’ll assume the wider part of his 3B range which would look like:
    33+,A3s+,KTs+,A7o+ = 200 combos
    If I 4-bet in this situation this situation I would typically bet just under 3x his raise so I’m considering a 4bet of 35BB.
    I estimate he will continue against this raise with a range of:
    TT+ AQs+ AKo = 51 combos
    So He’s folding 149 combination of starting hands
    = Fold frequency of 0.75
    My raise makes the pot 54BB. 35/54 = 0.648
    0.648 < 0.75 so I’m going to conclude that a bluff in this spot is profitable?
    I know the range I’ve given him here is highly debateable given the small sample size and that most opponents will tighten up more than this to a 4-bet, but I just settled on these ranges to practice this week’s lesson.
    I think that there are some mistakes.
    Since you've already put 4bb with your open raise, you are only risking 31bb, not 35bb.
    The total pot would be = 4bb (your or) + 13bb (his 3bet) + 1bb (the big blind) + 31bb (your 4bet) = 49bb

    So 31/49= 0.632

    Also, i would make the 4bet a bit smaller. Between 28bb-32bb.

    It's difficult to give an unknown villain a 3bet range.
    16% can look like:

    Yours:
    16a.jpg

    With more blockers:
    16b.jpg

    Or some other morphology.

    In this case i don't think it's relevant because you are not blocking lots of combos with your J6s and i think his all in range is the same despite his morphology. But your analysis may vary with a hand with blockers like KQ for example.
  3. #3
    All good points. Thanks man. More practice needed methinks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •