|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
It's fundamentally not how this format works wuf. The whole setup is designed around the idea of private chat, it's an extra dynamic specific to this game which villagers are using. Why are you against it? That's like saying you're against the seer is seer games. Or maybe you just like standard bread and butter games and bollocks to creative games that are a little different.
Or maybe you just don't want hoopy to figure out you're a wolf, and instead prefer to go down the "fuck private chat" road.
just because private chat is included in the format doesnt mean it's pro-v. i think it is anti-v, and we already have ample evidence to back me up. the only thing we have gotten out of private chat is players saying their links are village. oh and we got you saying yours is wolf and village
we have to either take everybody's word for it or ignore it completely. taking word for it is a losing strategy because we cant tell the difference between wolfmmm saying he cleared bid in chat and vilmmm saying he cleared bid in chat. so that means we have to ignore it completely, which means that nobody should be using it since the more they use it the less we have in game material to evaluate and the more we would need to depend up the private chat reads that we should need to ignore completely
i said it from the beginning. it is not player A's job to figure out the role of his link, player B. it is everybody else's job to figure it out and then convince player A of it. it is this way because if it's not it gives incredible wolf cover and it means the endgame consists of "just trust me" arguments
|
Reply With Quote