If I was wrong about someone, it would be MMM.
02-07-2015 09:07 AM
#1126
| |
If I was wrong about someone, it would be MMM. | |
| |
02-07-2015 09:30 AM
#1127
| |
| |
02-07-2015 09:32 AM
#1128
| |
Team DAV-RED & BOOG-STR owe this game some effort this d2. In particular, BigRed. If we go 6 irl days w/o him contributing, he gotta go b4 we sink a battleship again. | |
02-07-2015 09:35 AM
#1129
| |
02-07-2015 09:46 AM
#1130
| |
| |
02-07-2015 09:57 AM
#1131
| |
lynch daven | |
| |
02-07-2015 09:59 AM
#1132
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:01 AM
#1133
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:03 AM
#1134
| |
I'm already getting lynched so you'll get your way I guess, Rilla. | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:05 AM
#1135
| |
Based on your groupings, Wuf-Hoopy is always the correct lynch today. | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:05 AM
#1136
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:10 AM
#1137
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:13 AM
#1138
| |
Boog, post more please. | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:17 AM
#1139
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:19 AM
#1140
| |
ATM, w/o enuf info on/from Red, I agree with Ong here. I also see the value of (temporarily) preserving hardworking heavyhitter villagers despite being chained to criminals. Rilla & Ong need to stay, we can contain their partners for now. I still like Wuf. So... | |
02-07-2015 10:21 AM
#1141
| |
That reads diff from what wad in my head. Bottom line is what matters. | |
02-07-2015 10:23 AM
#1142
| |
I think we're going for the daven side of bigred-daven | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:27 AM
#1143
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:28 AM
#1144
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:36 AM
#1145
| |
lynch bigred | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:38 AM
#1146
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:43 AM
#1147
| |
| |
02-07-2015 10:46 AM
#1148
| |
Me and Luco makes one V-V pair on the Dav-Red wagon. | |
02-07-2015 10:47 AM
#1149
| |
as opposed to what you're doing with me, rilla? If you haven't figured out that you're literally living or dying with me as a villager you're as worthless as MMM this game. | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:47 AM
#1150
| |
and wuf-hoopy is still a superior lynch to daven-bigred | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:50 AM
#1151
| |
I'll be amused if both rascal-ong and Hoopy-Wuf turn out V-V. that seems impossible though. | |
| |
02-07-2015 10:56 AM
#1152
| |
Also I'm not seeing any good posts from Boog really. Him calling Gabe "obvious manipulating wolf" and then pointing fingers after his lynch was pretty fishy. | |
| |
02-07-2015 11:16 AM
#1153
| |
No. | |
| |
02-07-2015 11:57 AM
#1154
| |
All I saw IRL yesterday was baudib flail and spazz on the chopping block. He's a wolf frustrated with himself at getting caught. No worries though, baudib, your white knight has arrived. | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:12 PM
#1155
| |
You detailed my thought progression explicitly. | |
02-07-2015 12:16 PM
#1156
| |
I've explained. It was a villager who moved the wagon off boog/monstr. With an hour to go, boog/monstr were leading a gabe/rong v/v pair by a vote or two. If there's a wolf in boog/monstr, why the hell were the wolves not trying harder to get gabe/rong lynched? | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:19 PM
#1157
| |
My read on wuf is neutral right now. He pushed really hard for revealing pairs and then went quiet when nothing happened which was worrying as that's unusual for him. The mega post he made is more in keeping with traditional wuf style + the after thoughts look genuine. | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:23 PM
#1158
| |
-.- | |
02-07-2015 12:25 PM
#1159
| |
Oh look a bigred wagon. I can get behind that, he's doing his usual awol stuff but his posts indicate that he's aware of what's going on. | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:27 PM
#1160
| |
02-07-2015 12:27 PM
#1161
| |
daven's vote for gabe is really fishy, bigred is practically unreadable. That pair will need to go, I imagine. | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:27 PM
#1162
| |
I would also support a boog or rascal lynch. | |
| |
02-07-2015 12:27 PM
#1163
| |
![]() ![]()
|
oh i see how that works. kill yourself and your partner so that either you or your partner can win. brilliant |
02-07-2015 12:36 PM
#1164
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
02-07-2015 12:37 PM
#1165
| |
| |
02-07-2015 12:40 PM
#1166
| |
02-07-2015 12:41 PM
#1167
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
02-07-2015 12:54 PM
#1168
| |
Because his effort is less today and he hasn't done anything yet to indicate he's a villager to me. Also his wagon yesterday was made up of villagers imo. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:01 PM
#1169
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:03 PM
#1170
| |
drew argues that the wolves might already be on gabe, so how can they influence it. baudib then hi fives drew by saying drew is owning me in logic. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:04 PM
#1171
| |
To lynch boog, we need a fucking solid case. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:09 PM
#1172
| |
I can't really argue against lynching boog but it would suck if he was a wolf | |
02-07-2015 01:10 PM
#1173
| |
![]() ![]()
|
i think using private chat is wrong. that's why ive said mostly nothing. if i have something important to say, it will be said in the game thread. we have always believed that it's important for everything to see the light of day in the game thread. the private chat format goes against this. |
02-07-2015 01:11 PM
#1174
| |
Turns out I am actually enjoying playing again. | |
02-07-2015 01:14 PM
#1175
| |
I should say that I'm not as convinced about rascal being a wolf as I was. Without going into too much detail, I believe his sincerity in regards to us getting lynched. Obviously backing away from that read looks wolfy, but I would still argue that it is totally reckless attention to bring myself, especially a game after getting punished for doing just that. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:15 PM
#1176
| |
Welcome back, Monstr. | |
02-07-2015 01:15 PM
#1177
| |
wuf more or less just claimed wolf imo | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:17 PM
#1178
| |
Ong...WTF? C'Mon mon. | |
02-07-2015 01:17 PM
#1179
| |
02-07-2015 01:18 PM
#1180
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:18 PM
#1181
| |
Like why can't you just come back into the thread with something short and sweet wuf. | |
02-07-2015 01:22 PM
#1182
| |
Last game, hoopy was a wolf, wuf was villager. wuf had a couple of reads on hoopy that were right. wuf, with his beautiful ego, would be happy with himself, patting himself on the back, pleased with how much he owned hoopy. Fast forward to this game, and wuf opens his role pm to find out that he's buddied to hoopy. Villager wuf thinks oh fucking yay, I can own the hoopster again! Woop de fucking doo! Wolf wuf thinks holy fuck trust me to roll wolf the one fucking game where I have to play villager in two threads. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:30 PM
#1183
| |
![]() ![]()
|
apparently you have no idea how reads work. all of our reads in this game are threadflow and style specific. i have zero desire to privately talk with anybody unless it's a romeo and juliet thing, where we already know each others' roles. |
02-07-2015 01:39 PM
#1184
| |
It's fundamentally not how this format works wuf. The whole setup is designed around the idea of private chat, it's an extra dynamic specific to this game which villagers are using. Why are you against it? That's like saying you're against the seer is seer games. Or maybe you just like standard bread and butter games and bollocks to creative games that are a little different. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:40 PM
#1185
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
02-07-2015 01:44 PM
#1186
| |
There's absolutely nothing in the wagonomics of Day 1 to suggest Boog can't be a wolf. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:45 PM
#1187
| |
Shut up wolf. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:46 PM
#1188
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:46 PM
#1189
| |
![]() ![]()
|
just because private chat is included in the format doesnt mean it's pro-v. i think it is anti-v, and we already have ample evidence to back me up. the only thing we have gotten out of private chat is players saying their links are village. oh and we got you saying yours is wolf and village |
02-07-2015 01:46 PM
#1190
| |
Pull some more numbers out of your arse baudib. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:50 PM
#1191
| |
This is classic deflection. Yes, I was calling loudly for people to examine Gabe. Then you make IRL excuses and say "Gabe is obvious manipulating wolf," wolfy late shift happens. It's funny because you started this post by blaming me and it end up not so subtly trying to cast suspicion on Keybored. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:51 PM
#1192
| |
I solved the game. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:52 PM
#1193
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:52 PM
#1194
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:52 PM
#1195
| |
![]() ![]()
|
exactly. private chat is not a reliable method of gathering information |
02-07-2015 01:53 PM
#1196
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:55 PM
#1197
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:56 PM
#1198
| |
Here's a giant post saying nothing. It's blatantly clear that everyone wants your assessment of each other and that practically everyone else is making judgments based on the opinions of partners. Your refusal to do so is hugely detrimental to the village. | |
| |
02-07-2015 01:59 PM
#1199
| |
| |
| |
02-07-2015 01:59 PM
#1200
| |
That's the nth time you've mischaracterized what I've done. | |