Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumWerewolf Village

Varchertine's Werewolf Game Thread

Results 1 to 75 of 3385

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    This is a solid post. It's totally unlike Wuf to explore every method of info gathering available.
    exactly. private chat is not a reliable method of gathering information

    pray tell what opinion of you im supposed to have from rilla? how about fuckall? the last person whose opinion i should care about when it comes to you is rilla's. and vise versa. this applies to all links.

    you guys should not care one bit what i think about hoopy because you dont know if im a wolf who is just propping hoopy up for my own benefit. on the one hand it baffles me that you guys dont see this, but on the other hand it is something wolves would think

    now if our links were not the same person who we had private chat with, we'd have a debate on our hands. i would still personally not use it much because all my reads are thread specific, but i think some villagers would be able to get reads in them and then after they die we would know they were serious. the way it is now, we cant know veracity of private chat since the chatters die at the same time

    but even then it still has a problem with regards to keeping players from posting outside the game thread
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    exactly. private chat is not a reliable method of gathering information

    pray tell what opinion of you im supposed to have from rilla? how about fuckall? the last person whose opinion i should care about when it comes to you is rilla's. and vise versa. this applies to all links.

    you guys should not care one bit what i think about hoopy because you dont know if im a wolf who is just propping hoopy up for my own benefit. on the one hand it baffles me that you guys dont see this, but on the other hand it is something wolves would think

    now if our links were not the same person who we had private chat with, we'd have a debate on our hands. i would still personally not use it much because all my reads are thread specific, but i think some villagers would be able to get reads in them and then after they die we would know they were serious. the way it is now, we cant know veracity of private chat since the chatters die at the same time

    but even then it still has a problem with regards to keeping players from posting outside the game thread
    Here's a giant post saying nothing. It's blatantly clear that everyone wants your assessment of each other and that practically everyone else is making judgments based on the opinions of partners. Your refusal to do so is hugely detrimental to the village.

    The fact that Hoopy won't clear you or give you more than a tepid "neutral" response should worry everyone.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    Here's a giant post saying nothing. It's blatantly clear that everyone wants your assessment of each other and that practically everyone else is making judgments based on the opinions of partners. Your refusal to do so is hugely detrimental to the village.

    The fact that Hoopy won't clear you or give you more than a tepid "neutral" response should worry everyone.
    i dont want anybody else's assesmment from private chat, and i dont care if they want mine. just like i dont jump off a bridge because others are doing it. just like i dont believe in god just because most people do

    you are arguing that it is good policy to just take peoples' word for it. i am arguing that it is not

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •