|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
More to the point, none of the people in the dinghies are traffickers. If we accept that they're asylum seekers, their means of getting to our country is irrelevant imo.
First sentence, no problem. Second, problem.
It matters. It's relevant because it's allowing a criminal and highly immoral business to thrive. And it matters because for every person that enters illegally, that's one less person who can enter legally. Why do you want to prioritise those who enter illegally? Why do you think the UK as a state should be forced to accept these asylum seekers instead of the ones filling in paperwork in Paris or whatever?
|