I'll bet he's exposing himself to a lot of right-wing "alternative facts"
Incorrect. I'm far too lazy for that. I mean, when did I even say anything that you believe to be an "alternative fact"? I've been quick to point out that many "facts" you state are just your interpretation, you opinion.

But calling them a group of "peaceful" protestors who did nothing worse than "occupy a gov't building" is something only an idiot would say.
I think this is idiotic. You say you're in no doubt this was a "coup". So why did they leave without a fight? And while there were certainly isolated incidents of violence, the "mob" weren't violent. I watched multiple streams for hours and saw nothing that I considered to be "violent", other than a woman getting shot by police. Obviously I did not watch everything, and I'm aware a cop died after being attacked with a fire extinguisher, so clearly there was violence. But the protest itself was ridiculously mild compared to what we've seen over the last year. What has made this different is the choice of location for the protest, and the method of protest.

I think what we saw the other day was a more acceptable form of protest than outright riots and looting. The only question is whether it was justified, and that really does depend on what motivated these people. I believe they think the election was stolen from them, and on that basis I would say the protest was justified. It's irrelevant if it actually was stolen.

It's kinda dumb to say that at first when the facts aren't in yet, but when the facts come in and you keep sticking to that argument, you are indeed an idiot.
What facts?

(one apparently from accidentally tasering himself in the balls and giving himself a heart attack).
I hope this is a fact.

6. Finally the National Guard is called in and the mob is removed.
This isn't a fact. The NG turned up after they had already left the Capitol.