You say I'm being emotional, when the exact opposite is true. I don't form my political opinions based on emotion, I try to put emotion aside, which is why you consider me a "heartless bastard". I might come across as emotional in my arguing, but that's purely because I can get a little carried away, I can be a little too enthusiastic. That's because I actually have fun debating these topics strongly. But my opinions are not emotional. You guys (and I'll include mojo here) are emotional. You're motivated primarily by your hatred for Trump. I don't carry that burden. I don't hate Trump, or Biden, or Boris, in fact I don't hate anyone. Mojo isn't motivated by hate though, his emotion emerges in his sensitivity, not in his opinions. His emotion is reactive. But yours isn't. It's clear to see when you discuss anything political, whether it's US politics, Brexit, whatever. You have actual contempt for your political opponents, as though having an opinion that differs to you is outright immoral.

So no, I reject your charge that I am emotional.

I don't take offence to being called an idiot for a few reasons... One, I definitely can be an idiot sometimes. We all can. Two, the term "idiot" is subjective, someone out there might agree with me and think you're the idiots. And three, I don't take offence to being called names because I'm not sensitive to such things, I grew up when the proverb "sticks and stones" was a valuable lesson for children.

I think that proverb has changed now to "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will literally kill me".