Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by poop
    The sweetest irony of this is that Ong calls US hypocrites, but if Remainers had stormed Parliament while the Brexit bill was being passed because some Remainer loony and the loony media had convinced them the referendum was rigged, he'd have been calling for them all to be shot in the face on the spot for opposing democracy. He wouldn't be making arguments about how they had a right to act on their deluded beliefs.
    Hey poop, just go right ahead and make up stories about how I would act in a hypothetical situation, and hold it up as fact.

    This is 100% incorrect speculation. Try to engage objectively poop. I know it's hard, but you can do it.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Hey poop, just go right ahead and make up stories about how I would act in a hypothetical situation, and hold it up as fact.

    This is 100% incorrect speculation. Try to engage objectively poop. I know it's hard, but you can do it.
    What would you do in that hypothetical situation then? Please tell us so we can see your true beliefs on the sacred nature of protestor's rights.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    What would you do in that hypothetical situation then? Please tell us so we can see your true beliefs on the sacred nature of protestor's rights.
    I would ask if these people really though the result was fraudulent, or if they were just trying to overthrow a result they didn't like.

    Which is precisely what I was asking while I was watching this event live. I think these people really believe it. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I got.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    I would ask if these people really though the result was fraudulent, or if they were just trying to overthrow a result they didn't like.
    So if you thought they really believed it, you'd be ok with them storming Parliament and forcing all the MPs to run to the basement for their own safety?



    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Which is precisely what I was asking while I was watching this event live. I think these people really believe it. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I got.
    Again, it's not relevant whether they were sincerely deluded or not. You are not allowed to break one law because you believe some other law has been broken.

    Frankly I'm surprised you are taking these views, since you're so strongly in favour of law and order that you want looters to be executed on sight (unless of course it's public property they're looting, which is fine).

    Do you see the contradiction in what you're saying here? I'm genuinely curious.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by poop
    So if you thought they really believed it, you'd be ok with them storming Parliament and forcing all the MPs to run to the basement for their own safety?
    Who gives a fuck about MPs running for the basement? That isn't what makes it right or wrong.

    If I thought someone really believed that democracy was being taken away from us, then yes, I would support their right to peaceful protest. And occupying a major government building is preferable to many other forms of protest, such as an actual riot.

    You are not allowed to break one law because you believe some other law has been broken.
    This is contentious. It depends on the severity of the law in question. I mean, we're talking about trespass here. Let's not lose perspective.

    Frankly I'm surprised you are taking these views, since you're so strongly in favour of law and order that you want looters to be executed on sight (unless of course it's public property they're looting, which is fine).

    Do you see the contradiction in what you're saying here? I'm genuinely curious.
    I'm surprised you can't distinguish between the looting of private businesses vs the vandalism of a government office. That you see a contradiction implies you see these two things as equivalent.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    I'm surprised you can't distinguish between the looting of private businesses vs the vandalism of a government office. That you see a contradiction implies you see these two things as equivalent.
    The law makes no such distinction. And since your previously professed concern was with upholding law and order, why do you?

    I mean, I get that you don't like gov't in general, but you have to admit they're kind of necessary for law and order.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  7. #7
    I stopped watching that link when he emphasised the word "INVASION".

    Biased news source. Not reliable information.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •