*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[Jack Sawyer]

Jack - your opinion of the Zimmerman case is colored by words that YOU inserted into the narrative. You're not perceiving facts. you're letting your own brain confirmation-bias you into believing that Zimmerman was a thug and Trayvon sweet and harmless.

Thugs generally shoot people.

It was so clearly the other way around, I can't possibly understand why you insist on being in such denial. Please ask Oskar to borrow some IQ's before posting on this again.

Your lack of empathy is baffling.

Why do you say "randomly" so much? Trayvon was in a place he wasn't supposed to be.

Enough for a death penalty apparently.

That's what alerted Zimmerman. That's why he called the cops.

Good for him.

You say he should go home. Maybe.

End of argument

But just because he doesn't go home, doesn't make him a criminal.

Nah, he wanted more. He got more. The other guy too.

Surveillance is not illegal.

Yeah, there is a nice invention called a camera just for that.

It's not even unreasonable if you're a member of group charged with the function of neighborhood surveillance.

If you wanted to follow people around in the name of neighbourhood watch, please identify yourself as being so.

You can call it stalking, following, harassing, or whatever pejorative verb your demagogue imagination chooses. But you're only deluding yourself by using these loaded terms to describe perfectly reasonable actions.

Only perfectly reasonable if you are actively looking for action.

That is just about exactly what happened.

How do you know this? After the fact a keyring flashlight was found? LOL

You must not have seen the video of cops planting evidence just so then turning on their bodycams.

You must have forgot that part because it doesn't fit your racist-thug narrative.

It fits Zimmerman's Batman narrative perfectly

Zimmerman did exactly what you're calling for here, and Trayvon clocked him in the head.

This is the problem. I probably would too.

What was he expecting once he decided to follow the guy?

PLEASE GET THE FUCKING FACTS

This is a question of fact for a jury. A jury was convened. The question was asked. The jury gave its answer. Why are you still asking the question?

OJ's jury aquitted him as well. Spoiler alert; he did it