Jack - your opinion of the Zimmerman case is colored by words that YOU inserted into the narrative. You're not perceiving facts. you're letting your own brain confirmation-bias you into believing that Zimmerman was a thug and Trayvon sweet and harmless.

It was so clearly the other way around, I can't possibly understand why you insist on being in such denial. Please ask Oskar to borrow some IQ's before posting on this again.

Why do you say "randomly" so much? Trayvon was in a place he wasn't supposed to be. That's what alerted Zimmerman. That's why he called the cops. You say he should go home. Maybe. But just because he doesn't go home, doesn't make him a criminal. Surveillance is not illegal. It's not even unreasonable if you're a member of group charged with the function of neighborhood surveillance. You can call it stalking, following, harassing, or whatever pejorative verb your demagogue imagination chooses. But you're only deluding yourself by using these loaded terms to describe perfectly reasonable actions.

You can also do a flashlight on the dude or something and shout loudly so that more people hear the commotion, from afar, "I saw you jumping a fence, you are not from around here, I have the cops on the phone right here".
That is just about exactly what happened. You must have forgot that part because it doesn't fit your racist-thug narrative. Zimmerman did exactly what you're calling for here, and Trayvon clocked him in the head. PLEASE GET THE FUCKING FACTS

I wonder if he would have followed him without having a gun on him.
This is a question of fact for a jury. A jury was convened. The question was asked. The jury gave its answer. Why are you still asking the question?