hands from my first 6 Handed 2NL session

[sven00100]

Don't bet full pot though
*edit* stats might be skewed because just because you check the flop doesn't mean you lose the hand, and you're trying to find the play with the highest expectation. Just because betting is profitable doesn't mean it has the largest expectation (I think it does in this scenario though)

I know, I mean, I was making it very simplified, I think non-aces fold to less than a pot bet, much like I did. If I led there for 2/3 pot, and he had KK i'd expect a fold... I also don't think he's often putting in a lot if i check with the 77-99, but I think here the stats (simplified) point to b/f rather than c/f.. then c/f a non king turn, re-evaluate river.

But thank you for sticking with your post .

[Imthenewfish]

I know, I mean, I was making it very simplified, I think non-aces fold to less than a pot bet, much like I did. If I led there for 2/3 pot, and he had KK i'd expect a fold... I also don't think he's often putting in a lot if i check with the 77-99, but I think here the stats (simplified) point to b/f rather than c/f.. then c/f a non king turn, re-evaluate river.

But thank you for sticking with your post .

If he never bets with non-ace hands I think stats show c/f as more profitable as long as you don't pay draws when they hit.