Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Poker Forum › FTR Community ›

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 04-24-2019 01:43 PM #1
    Poopadoop's Avatar
    Poopadoop
    Poopadoop is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,445
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    PS - Does this mean we are moving on from you retarded A/B game? Just because something is cannot be concluded to be A, doesn't mean it's not A.
    It certainly suggests that it's B, but only if you have common sense.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  2. 04-24-2019 01:44 PM #2
    TheSpoonald
    TheSpoonald is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    663
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    It certainly suggests that it's B, but only if you have common sense.
    No it doesn't. And if you have common sense, you wouldn't jump to conclude B, or even strongly suspect B without evidence.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  3. 04-24-2019 01:48 PM #3
    Poopadoop's Avatar
    Poopadoop
    Poopadoop is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,445
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    No it doesn't. And if you have common sense, you wouldn't jump to conclude B, or even strongly suspect B without evidence.
    No but if there really was no evidence you would wonder why so much evidence was discussed, leading to the conclusion of not A.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  4. 04-24-2019 01:50 PM #4
    TheSpoonald
    TheSpoonald is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    663
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    No but if there really was no evidence you would wonder why so much evidence was discussed
    How much evidence was discussed? Wanna try this again?

    1) Of the 10 possible instances of obstruction cited in the MR, which do you think presents the strongest case for criminal activity?

    2) What evidence of the act do you find compelling?

    3) What evidence of intent do you find compelling?

    4) In the instance you chose, how does Trump's behavior differ from the behavior that you would reasonably expect from someone who is frustrated at being framed for treason by partisan operatives within his own executive branch
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  5. 04-24-2019 01:54 PM #5
    Poopadoop's Avatar
    Poopadoop
    Poopadoop is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,445
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    How much evidence was discussed? Wanna try this again?
    Already done. Why keep beating a dead banana?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules