*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[TheSpoonald]

have a look at this:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...ump-obstructed

PAAAAHHHH - FUCKING - THETIC

There isn't a single syllable in that entire thing that makes a case for obstruction. It just says "don't lose hope dems, it might still could maybe possibly somehow someway still happen if we're all really good boys and girls this year"

PS - Does this mean we are moving on from you retarded A/B game? Just because something is cannot be concluded to be A, doesn't mean it's not A.

[Poopadoop]

PS - Does this mean we are moving on from you retarded A/B game? Just because something is cannot be concluded to be A, doesn't mean it's not A.

It certainly suggests that it's B, but only if you have common sense.

[TheSpoonald]

It certainly suggests that it's B, but only if you have common sense.

No it doesn't. And if you have common sense, you wouldn't jump to conclude B, or even strongly suspect B without evidence.

[Poopadoop]

No it doesn't. And if you have common sense, you wouldn't jump to conclude B, or even strongly suspect B without evidence.

No but if there really was no evidence you would wonder why so much evidence was discussed, leading to the conclusion of not A.

[TheSpoonald]

No but if there really was no evidence you would wonder why so much evidence was discussed

How much evidence was discussed? Wanna try this again?

1) Of the 10 possible instances of obstruction cited in the MR, which do you think presents the strongest case for criminal activity?

2) What evidence of the act do you find compelling?

3) What evidence of intent do you find compelling?

4) In the instance you chose, how does Trump's behavior differ from the behavior that you would reasonably expect from someone who is frustrated at being framed for treason by partisan operatives within his own executive branch

[Poopadoop]

How much evidence was discussed? Wanna try this again?

Already done. Why keep beating a dead banana?

[Poopadoop]

There isn't a single syllable in that entire thing that makes a case for obstruction.

The article is not a legal document; that's not its purpose. It also doesn't say ice cream is yummy. But it is.

It just says "don't lose hope dems, it might still could maybe possibly somehow someway still happen if we're all really good boys and girls this year"

Where does it say that? I missed that part.

[TheSpoonald]

The article is not a legal document;

It's not an article either.

I missed that part.

you missed this part too

BY KEN HUGHES, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 04/19/19 01:30 PM EDT 849 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN

[Poopadoop]

It's not an article either.


you missed this part too

No i saw it was an opinion. An opinion that quotes directly from the M.R.

[TheSpoonald]

No i saw it was an opinion. An opinion that quotes directly from the M.R.

weird, I couldn't find the quote you cited in post 4735

Fake news

[Poopadoop]

weird, I couldn't find the quote you cited in post 4735

Fake news

Look harder.

[TheSpoonald]

Look harder.

I tried searching the page for the word "accede". It's not there man.

In the passage quoted in post 4735, I'm wondering why the quotation marks don't close. Where are the closing quotes supposed to be?