*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

From the MR



there was nothing stopping the report from concluding Trump had obstructed justice but that he could not be indicted as president. Instead the report declaratively says

lol, are you going back now to denying that Mueller couldn't conclude Trump was guilty?

[TheSpoonald]

lol, are you going back now to denying that Mueller couldn't conclude Trump was guilty?

A determination of guilt is a matter for a court and a jury. So I'm not denying that Mueller couldn't find Trump guilty. He could not.

Another thing he couldn't do....make a decision about indictment/charges.....that's the AG's job. So if Mueller had conclusive evidence of obstruction, he could have presented it as such. He would not be violating his vow to not indict a president, as that decision would not be his anyway.

Dont be as dumb as oskar thinking that only congress has the power to do anything about the findings in the MR

[Poopadoop]

A determination of guilt is a matter for a court and a jury. So I'm not denying that Mueller couldn't find Trump guilty. He could not.

Another thing he couldn't do....make a decision about indictment/charges.....that's the AG's job. So if Mueller had conclusive evidence of obstruction, he could have presented it as such. He would not be violating his vow to not indict a president, as that decision would not be his anyway.

He did present evidence. He did not say the president was innocent of OOJ. He operated under the principle that he couldn't even recommend indictment because of 'sitting president blahblahbah'.

Why are trying to make this into an argument again? you've already grudgingly accepted all of this.

[TheSpoonald]

Another thing I learned today, Mueller could have filed a sealed indictment to be opened after Trump left office.

That's what he would do if he had enough evidence to charge on obstruction.

He didn't do that

[Poopadoop]

Another thing I learned today, Mueller could have filed a sealed indictment to be opened after Trump left office.

That's what he would do if he had enough evidence to charge on obstruction.

He didn't do that

Sealed indictments are made public now? Do you know what a 'sealed indictment' is?

Edit: Oh ffs you are so desperate. He already said he can't indict the president, not even a sealed indictment. Ffs.

[TheSpoonald]

Sealed indictments are made public now? Do you know what a 'sealed indictment' is?

Edit: Oh ffs you are so desperate. He already said he can't indict the president, not even a sealed indictment. Ffs.

He can file a sealed indictment because it wouldn't be against a sitting president. It would only be opened after he's not sitting anymore.

And it would not be public. But it would also mean that justice was served. And shouldn't that be the end of it?

So can you not conclude that either A) No crime was committed or B) Sealed indictments were already filed and Trump can face the music in 2025. Are you not satisfied with either of those outcomes?