*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[Jack Sawyer]

Jack, you're equating the overt murderous-ness of an Islamic ideology to the sales of armaments to the military forces of a sovereign nation.

An islamic ideology. Oh, we have progress there.

I brought forth WHY wahhabi islam is such a problem nowadays, and not all of Islam and all muslims as some of you have been claiming. With facts and links to said facts.

I also clearly outlined why we got to where we got. You can clearly see the role of Team America world Police in there.

Details matter. Also nuance. Using broad strokes just because you do not understand something is just stupid.


Besides, where do you think all this beef comes from?

An angry violent mob 300 million strong is out there with it's mind set on thoroughly exterminating the west.

Why are they set up on angrily exterminating the west? Did the west have any play in that? Should we just ignore (recent) history?

Are you trying to tell me that's perfectly fine?

Is it fine selling weapons to sovereign nations knowing full well what they are going to do with them? Is it fine invading countries for natural resources then claiming to be holier than thou?

And that it should be allowed to continue to exist unchallenged?

The same applies to the other side.

And that if any of those individuals manage to get their hands on a weapon,

Oh well, god damn

then whatever violence that ensues is the responsibility of the weapon manufacturer???????

Golly gee wiz.

Also LOL with the subtle strawman. Remember how I said:

Let's follow this logic. So, by enabling the Military Industrial Complex in destroying the whole Yemeni civilization by not giving a fuck that it's actually happening, should you Banana be held responsible as well?

This is a pathetic false equivalency.

This was your point. I followed you own logic. It's frankly beautiful how you think your own logic is false equivalency when I use it, yet perfectly fine when you do


As a reminder, this is what you said:

I hold group B responsible for group A's actions. By tolerating bad actors, they enable their behavior. And that's how I feel it's appropriate to hold the entire group responsible for the actions of group A

Frankly Im disappointed in you Jack

Join the club. I have been dissapointed in you for a while now, since I realized you are not a rational actor. At first I didn't even give you play, as I thought you were spoon's troll.

However, you don't care about debating, about understanding another person's point; you only care about being right, and when given overwhelming evidence you are not, you just do the finger to the ears thing.

I'm not doing this with you.

What? Banana shutting the fuck up? Must be a new day