|
|
You know, this is really pathetic. I know you don't believe any of this. I know you're just trying to put me down and argue with me. You're doing a miserable job.
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Assigning guilt to everyone whom has some characteristic in common with the bad people is where you've gone fully 'tarded.
"some characteristic in common". Do you know how dumb you sound when you say this? The common characteristic that they ALL share is a POSITIVELY MURDEROUS IDEOLOGY. That's way different than saying "they all hate ham". Get a god damn clue man.
Noting that not everyone whom follows that ideology is a bad person is all you need to realize that there is not a 1:1 correlation between the ideology and the problems caused by some people whom hold that ideology.
Why is that 1:1 correlation meaningful to you? Why is that the be-all, end-all border of right and wrong?
For all you like to criticize me as a scientist, you seem to lack understanding of the fundamental premise of science: When ANY evidence shows a contradiction to the thesis, we discard that thesis and revise.
This isn't a one of your roody poo chemistry set projects. This is actual life and death. And I don't need 100% corroborating evidence to conclude that an entire group of people is fucking toxic.
I mean, think logically for two god damn seconds man. Let's test out your "fundamental premise of science" and see if it holds up in this situation....
It is a fact that there were members of German battalions who conscientiously objected to killing Jews. That means that there is less than 100% corroborating evidence to conclude that "All Nazis want to kill Jews".
If you're a Jewish person in 1930's Poland and you hear that the Nazi's are coming to town.....are you worried?
|
Reply With Quote