Trump is the WWE and Mueller is The Undertaker

[BananaStand]

Collusion isn't a crime, but treason is. In fact it's one of things directly mentioned in the constitution.

OMFG get off your demagogue soapbox. No one is even talking about treason.

Obviously I was mocking your side who always say 'b-b-but collusion isn't a crime!'. Well actually it is, when it's done with the purpose of conspiring with a foreign power to influence an election. It's then high treason. Like, walk the plank time.

I thought you weren't a lawyer?? I challenge you to go find a lawyer, and ask what the actual definition of treason is.

Now, your argument, because you watch a lot of Fox News, is that there's no evidence of collusion.

That's my argument because it's self-evidently true.

As if the first thing any good prosecutor does when he obtains evidence is go to the press with it.

It's not possible for any evidence to exist. This can be easily deduced logically if your IQ is high enough. If the allegations were true, then other things would be true. Like A) Paul Manafort wouldn't have just been found guilty on 8 counts of tax fraud. B) Carter Page's net worth would be twice what Trump's is C) Russian soldiers wouldn't be dead at the hands of US missiles. D) The Ukraine would not be armed. And I could go on....

Mueller has had ZERO leaks in 2+ years

FALSE. Just plain wrong. Like immensely, embarrassingly wrong.

So you don't know what evidence he does or doesn't have

If he had evidence, he wouldn't be begging Trump to walk into a perjury trap.

all you know is who he's been talking to, which is pretty much everyone around Trump and his campaign. Even fucking Omarosa's been interviewed by Mueller.

Do any of those people seem worried?

If I were Trump I'd be a bit uneasy with that.

And yet if he complained at all you'd excoriate him for being a weak crybaby. God you're a piece of work!

I'd also wonder why the WH Counsel spent 30 hours talking to Mueller. Whatever could they be discussing? How it's all a witch hunt? lol.

Yeah, 2 years at this and he spent a little over 1 day with a guy.....lol, he must have found the smoking gun!!

A dozen people have been working full time for almost two years. That's probably 40,000 man hours. And you think the fact that they spent 30 of those hours on one witness is significant?

Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is flaring up again. Go take your common-sense suppository

[Poopadoop]

OMFG get off your demagogue soapbox. No one is even talking about treason.

If they are talking about collusion, they are talking about treason. Just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it's not true.

I thought you weren't a lawyer?? I challenge you to go find a lawyer, and ask what the actual definition of treason is.

I think you need to go talk to a lawyer. You remind me of someone I once dealt with who thought they could make up their own laws. They lost.

That's my argument because it's self-evidently true.

What's self evident about it? That Mueller hasn't shown you personally his evidence? lol keep living the dream buddy.

It's not possible for any evidence to exist. This can be easily deduced logically if your IQ is high enough. If the allegations were true, then other things would be true. Like A) Paul Manafort wouldn't have just been found guilty on 8 counts of tax fraud. B) Carter Page's net worth would be twice what Trump's is C) Russian soldiers wouldn't be dead at the hands of US missiles. D) The Ukraine would not be armed. And I could go on....

I'm sure you could go on and on spewing nonsense that has nothing to do with evidence indefinitely, yes.

If he had evidence, he wouldn't be begging Trump to walk into a perjury trap.

Trump's lawyers (I shoud say spin doctors, 'cause real lawyers don't go on the news every day and talk about their client's case) are the ones who keep talking about a 'perjury trap'. The strategy is not hard to see for someone with an IQ over 40. Pretend Trump wants to talk to Mueller. Pretend his lawyers are keeping him from doing so, because it's 'a trick'. Lol.

Reality: Trump probably does want to talk to Mueller, because he really is that stupid. Guiliani et al are probably holding onto all four of his arms and legs so he doesn't. In the end he shouldn't if he doesn't have to. The guy is fundamentally incapable of telling the truth. He couldn't even get through an interview with Lester Holt without incriminating himself lol.

Do any of those people seem worried?

Is that relevant evidence to something? If someone looks worried? Fuck you should be a lawyer.

And yet if he complained at all you'd excoriate him for being a weak crybaby. God you're a piece of work!

Where have you been? He's been screaming about it for the last two days. And no I don't say he's a crybaby (when did i say that?). I say he's a moron and a conman.

Yeah, 2 years at this and he spent a little over 1 day with a guy.....lol, he must have found the smoking gun!!

A dozen people have been working full time for almost two years. That's probably 40,000 man hours. And you think the fact that they spent 30 of those hours on one witness is significant?

A lot of things can be talked about in 30 hours. Just because they didn't spend the whole 2 years talking to one person doesn't mean anything.

Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is flaring up again. Go take your common-sense suppository

Oh, you so funny! If only there was a suppository that made everyone watch and believe Fox News, then life would be grand for you Trumptards.

[OngBonga]

Ok, it's certainly a crime though

Colluding? I don't know if it is or isn't. I would imagine it would depend on the nature of the collusion, and do you suppose we're going to hear the turth from either side?

[Poopadoop]

Colluding? I don't know if it is or isn't. I would imagine it would depend on the nature of the collusion, and do you suppose we're going to hear the turth from either side?

We're certainly never going to hear the truth from anyone who's guilty if that's what you mean.

And yes, accepting foreign aid in an election is definitely illegal. You can't take money from the UK gov't to run the R campaign in the US, for example. Nor can you take it if the UK gov't offers you pics of Trump being peed on in the Moscow Hilton.

[OngBonga]

And no, it's not legal to accept help from a hostile nation to affect your own country's election just because there isn't a war going on at the time.

Do you know this? Quote me the specific law that it breaks. I'm not saying you're wrong, it's just I haven't a fucking clue and I'm unconvinced you have a clue either.

I know collusion is not treason, that took seconds of googling.