Trump is the WWE and Mueller is The Undertaker

[Poopadoop]

What do you think McGahn was doing talking to Mueller for 30 hours? Do you think it was another 3D chess move to get Hillary to drop her guard before the SWAT team swoops in and drags her to jail?

[BananaStand]

What do you think McGahn was doing talking to Mueller for 30 hours?

well, since McGahn didn't subsequently plead guilty to anything...I suspect they didn't talk about much. Buzz around this says that McGahn's account of things suggest that Mueller has no evidence of collusion, and has abandoned any possibility of making that charge. Instead, he's trying to make a case for obstruction....but that's a non-starter and everyone knows it.

Do you think it was another 3D chess move to get Hillary to drop her guard before the SWAT team swoops in and drags her to jail?

Hmmm, you can talk to wuf about that shit.

[Poopadoop]

well, since McGahn didn't subsequently plead guilty to anything...I suspect they didn't talk about much. Buzz around this says that McGahn's account of things suggest that Mueller has no evidence of collusion, and has abandoned any possibility of making that charge. Instead, he's trying to make a case for obstruction....but that's a non-starter and everyone knows it.

Strangely enough I've heard a different buzz. McGahn knows Trump is doing greasy shit in the WH and wants to come clean with Mueller so he doesn't go down with him the way Dean went down with Nixon.

Also, I thought collusion wasn't a crime. You'd think Mueller would know that too, being a law type guy and all. Seems strange he'd be trying to find evidence of a non-crime.

[BananaStand]

Also, I thought collusion wasn't a crime. You'd think Mueller would know that too, being a law type guy and all. Seems strange he'd be trying to find evidence of a non-crime.

Collusion would still be grounds for a recommendation of impeachment. DUH

[Poopadoop]

Collusion would still be grounds for a recommendation of impeachment. DUH

According to whom? DUH

[BananaStand]

According to whom? DUH

The constitution...DUH

Have you really been this clueless throughout this entire investigation? Seriously dude???

The president CAN'T be charged with a crime. The only thing that was EVER on the table was a recommendation of impeachment.

[Poopadoop]

The constitution...DUH

Have you really been this clueless throughout this entire investigation? Seriously dude???

The president CAN'T be charged with a crime. The only thing that was EVER on the table was a recommendation of impeachment.

Impeachment requires treason, bribery, or high crimes and misdemeanors. I'm not a lawyer but pretty sure all of those are crimes. I guess you could argue 'misdemeanor' is open to interpretation if you wanna pick nits, but whatever.

Anyways, all indicators are your boy is going to get smoked in the midterms and then spend two or less more years tweeting about witch hunts until he either gets impeached or tossed out on his fat orange ass by the electorate. There's no happy ending for Trumpy Boy. It sure is fun watching him lose his shit though. Hope he doesn't have a stroke.

[wufwugy]

Hmmm, you can talk to wuf about that shit.

That ya have thought I believe any of these sorts of things is testament that an idea can grow so ridiculously away from the facts.

[BananaStand]

That ya have thought I believe any of these sorts of things is testament that an idea can grow so ridiculously away from the facts.

whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa

Have you, or have you not postulated that Mueller is in fact investigating deep state corruption and the ultimate outcome of his inquiry will be the indictments of Obama administration officials within the department of justice?

[wufwugy]

whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa

Have you, or have you not postulated that Mueller is in fact investigating deep state corruption and the ultimate outcome of his inquiry will be the indictments of Obama administration officials within the department of justice?

Of course I have postulated that, as any free thinker would. Doesn't mean I believe it.

What I acknowledge is that the facts tell us what meets the eye is unlikely to be what is happening.

[BananaStand]

Of course I have postulated that, as any free thinker would. Doesn't mean I believe it.

Where did I say you believe it?

I'll say that I'm a free thinker, and I don't believe it's possible. That would mean that Mueller roasted Manafort as an elaborate distraction. Cmon man.

I do think that Brennan, McCabe, and Ohr are all in serious serious serious fucking trouble. But I don't think their crimes were exposed as a result of Mueller's work. Alot of people forget that Mueller's investigation is actually the third attempt to expose a Russian connection to the White House. The House and Senate intelligence committees each did their own inquiries into this, and that's where we learned about all the shady shit, and that's what got those guys in trouble.

[wufwugy]

Where did I say you believe it?

I may have conflated what you said with what I've seen others say in the past

Muh bad

[oskar]

Of course I have postulated that, as any free thinker would.

As any free thinker would?
"Sir, did you postulate that the ultimate outcome of the Mueller probe will be that Obama is going to prison? - No? Well I guess you're not a free thinker, then! ANY free thinker would have postulated that. If you didn't postulate that, I don't know what kind of thinker you are, but you sure as hell aren't a FREE thinker!"

I guess any free thinker would have also made statements like "russia is still a thing? el oh el" - just a couple of days ago.

I'm predicting (different from postulating) that there will be a lot more free thinking happening around these parts in the coming months. Will take a lot of free thinking to convince yourself that you've been on the right side of history, and I believe you'll be able to do it.