You'd get better agreement from spoon on this one. Shame he disappeared again.

The definition of sexual misconduct is not the crux of the issue.
Well, the casting of a wider net is not something I'm comfortable with, and so it's an issue for me.

Though you're right about it's expanded use, that's just one symptom of a larger problem that's been going on for decades. That is, the systemic marginalization of masculinity.
Well here's the difference... for decades it wasn't working. Now it is.

Virtually everyone, believes that there is a "wage gap".
There is, but it's due to perfectly logical reasons, rather than discrimination. In fact it might have been you who churned the numbers out that I took notice of... can't remember the numbers, but women are infinitely more likely to take time off work to give birth, and in doing so they lose out on performance bonuses and pay rises and the like. So the average wage for a 30 y/o female and 30 y/o male doing exactly the same job will probably show a "wage gap".

Further, you'll get high profile cases where people actually have access to the numbers, but forget they are dealing with special cases with a very small sample size... such as tennis. Men did until recently win more for winning Wimbledon than women. But they do more work... they play five sets, not three. Also, there is greater commercial interest in the men's game (fuck knows why), so it's perfectly logical that they earn more. Now the bitches get the same, so they're actually earning more per hour. There's a wage gap.

Wage gaps exist, of course they do, but it's not just as binary as men getting paid more, and it's nearly always because of economic reasons, and has fuck all to do with discrimination.