*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[BananaStand]

But in general, my argument rests mainly on the premise that given a choice between two bad candidates, people took what they felt was the lesser of two evils.

And what happened before that? People took what they felt was the least of 17 evils?? Are you really being serious right now?

[Poopadoop]

And what happened before that? People took what they felt was the least of 17 evils?? Are you really being serious right now?

Primaries are a different matter as you know because they're largely based on the question of who has the best chance of winning rather than who will make a better president. Moreover, the voters in a primary represent only the party in question, not the population as a whole.

[Poopadoop]

Are you really being serious right now?

Are you?

Before you became fully indoctrinated by Fox News and the reverberations of your own rhetoric, you said something quite similar to my argument, along the lines of 'at least he's not as bad as Hillary'

[BananaStand]

Are you?

Definitely

Before you became fully indoctrinated by Fox News, you said something quite similar to my argument, along the lines of 'at least he's not as bad as Hillary'

You'll have to find me the quote on that. I know I'm on record as a non-Trump voter in the primary. I know I'm on record as being anti-wall. I know I'm on record as saying that I do find some of the stuff Trump says distasteful.

But there's just no cogent argument you can make that impugns the man's intelligence.

[Poopadoop]

You'll have to find me the quote on that.

I'm not going through your 1400+ posts to find the thing you said once or twice. But I do remember it striking me as contrasting a lot with Wuf's incessant Trump cheerleading. I was open to the idea you might be a reasonable person back then.

[BananaStand]

I'm not going through your 1400+ posts to find the thing you said once or twice. But I do remember it striking me as contrasting a lot with Wuf's incessant Trump cheerleading. I was open to the idea you might be a reasonable person back then.

So when I disagree with stuff about Trump being some kind of omnipotent, infallible, manipulator...you think I might be reasonable. But because I don't go all the way to "trump is stupid", you give up on that and just lump me in with all the kool-aid drinkers?

And you think Trump is socially inept?

As I've said before, it's a good thing I can't die of irony.

[Poopadoop]

So when I disagree with stuff about Trump being some kind of omnipotent, infallible, manipulator...you think I might be reasonable. But because I don't go all the way to "trump is stupid", you give up on that and just lump me in with all the kool-aid drinkers?

And you think Trump is socially inept?

As I've said before, it's a good thing I can't die of irony.

Let's unpack that because it makes clear why I don't give you as much credit as at the beginning.

when I disagree with stuff about Trump being some kind of omnipotent, infallible, manipulator...you think I might be reasonable.

Shouldn't that seem reasonable?

But because I don't go all the way to "trump is stupid", you give up on that and just lump me in with all the kool-aid drinkers?

Go back as far as it takes to find you saying one single negative thing about Trump, or one thing that doesn't parrot Fox News, and you'll understand how long a period of grace I've given you. You've reached the threshold now.

As I've said before, it's a good thing I can't die of irony.

This is an irrelevant add-on that shows you to be incapable of sticking to the argument without taking some douchey back-handed swipe at your opponent. It's a sign of low social intelligence. Maybe this is why you have trouble recognizing the same deficit in Trump.

[wufwugy]

I'm not going through your 1400+ posts to find the thing you said once or twice. But I do remember it striking me as contrasting a lot with Wuf's incessant Trump cheerleading. I was open to the idea you might be a reasonable person back then.

I'm very moderate on Trump.