|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
I don't care about your stance on final 4, and I don't care about your stance on reveal. I care about you latching on to spurious notions and running with them despite multiple people disagreeing with you. I fear the repercussions on your voting.
it looks to me like those who disagree with me are in the minority. it's just that nobody is sure of how to go about lynching people since links are hidden. my wagon leads because the small number of people who disagree with me have coalesced onto my wagon.
opting for 50% knowledge of deaths instead of 100% is stuuuuuuuuupid. i have seen cases for why it's good. meanwhile there are a million expressed reasons why it's bad.
if player A and player B are linked, a vote for player A is the exact same thing as a vote for player B. you are arguing that it is better to assess player A but not player B, and make a lynch choice on that. i am arguing that it is better to assess player A and player B. i cannot fathom why some people disagree with this.
I don't care to get into the specifics, but it's obvious that you, wuf, don't even understand what I disagree with you over.
Your answers to my quotes display that you think my read on your alignment has something to do with whether or not I agree with anything you're selling. That is not the case.
lol then WTF are you bolding me for? because you're a wolf. that's your only reason. you just said that your assessment of me has nothing to do with you bold on me. loltastic
It became a vote for the person who is most distracting to the village around that time.
you're the one distracting the village. we already have the evidence that hidden links are making people reluctant. everybody is doing as rilla said, holding things close to the vest, waiting and hoping the "right time" comes to reveal links. news flash: the right time is now because if it's not now it's too late. it's a fools errand to think we could spend so much of our days lynching with only half information yet somehow still win
|