Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

TP OOP Facing Monochromatic Board

Results 1 to 28 of 28

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    daviddem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,505
    Location
    Philippines/Saudi Arabia
    I only included the weak top pair hands because of OP's read. But even with these included, it seems to be stretching it to justify a river value bet. I would tend to c/f, and there would be a case to be made for c/c if he bluffs most of the time when checked to.

    secondly, is someone really gonna call 2x 3-quarter pot sized bets with TP/meh-kicker on that board?
    He may find justified to call the flop and turn with top pair / meh kicker if his kicker is a heart. But then it's harder to see him calling a river shove.

    I also wonder what hands a 37/34 flats preflop in MP. Also 37/34 at full ring is not just loose, it's more maniac.
    Last edited by daviddem; 01-29-2013 at 08:43 AM.
    Virginity is like a bubble: one prick and it's all gone
    Ignoranus (n): A person who is stupid AND an assh*le
  2. #2
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by daviddem View Post
    I only included the weak top pair hands because of OP's read. But even with these included, it seems to be stretching it to justify a river value bet. I would tend to c/f, and there would be a case to be made for c/c if he bluffs most of the time when checked to.

    He may find justified to call the flop and turn with top pair / meh kicker if his kicker is a heart. But then it's harder to see him calling a river shove.

    I also wonder what hands a 37/34 flats preflop in MP. Also 37/34 at full ring is not just loose, it's more maniac.
    Two points to make here. First, short-handed players probably don't realize how loose 37/34 is in full ring. That would be something like 50/45 or so in six-max, for example.

    Second, your logic on the bold doesn't make sense. From a point of view of balanced play, if a hand is only slightly too weak to value bet, then it goes into your check/call range instead of your check/fold range. Here's what Hero's range should look like on the river (not to scale):

    <---bluff--|--check/fold--|--check/call--|--value bet-->

    From the point of view of exploitative play, we'll need to have about 27% equity against Villain's betting range to make a +EV call. Being that bet bet check/call is the standard line to exploit loose idiots who can call twice with a lot of draws, it seems ridiculous to fold.
  3. #3
    DoubleJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    865
    Location
    Still on that feckin' island!
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow View Post
    ...short-handed players probably don't realize how loose 37/34 is in full ring. That would be something like 50/45 or so in six-max....
    true. i never even thought of that. however:

    Quote Originally Posted by daviddem View Post
    ...what hands [does] a 37/34 flat preflop in MP...
    is still an interesting question, 6Max or FR.

    the only reliable way to find out is observation over a large number of hands, but what if we don't have that luxury?

    Harrington has his rule-of-thumb thing of (VPIP-3bet)/2 for loose opponents. Does that have any value?
    don't want no tutti-frutti, no lollipop

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •