|
|
 Originally Posted by Zorkion
cc-22+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,54s
3bet-ak.
with high pps, im not as worried about postflop vulnerability, even given bu's tendencies, and im looking to build a big pot, which seems easier multiway than hu vs a passive fish. ak is 3bet for value, and to iso the pot.
You can see the above discussion on the merits of cold-calling with PPs and SCs and how there are differing opinions here... it basically boils down to whether you think you can take down pots on a semi-bluff enough of the time vs a nit playing a strong range.
3betting here depends on opp's tendencies, if he'd open with JJ and wouldnt' fold it to the 3bet, then obv QQ+ become clear value-3bets.
this one depends a little more on the stats, against opps who are positionally aware, and arent nitty tags,
cc- KK+,66-22,JTs,T9s,98s,87s
3bet- QQ-77,A2s+,K6s+,Q9s+,A2o+,K6o+,Q9o+
I can see some problems here - what is your plan cold-calling with small PP vs a TAGG open raising on the BU? Do you think set-mining is profitable vs his range?
You seem to realize that villain's range is wide here, since you're 3bet bluffing him so much. What is your intent 3-betting 77-99? I'd rather do this here with 22-66 and call with 77-99.
edit for moar stuff:
I notice you're 3betting ATo+, but I think these are perfectly fine hands to call with, since villain is going to have lots of dominated aces in his range that he would fold to a 3bet.
cc- TT-22,AQs-AJs,KQs,QJs,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,54s,AQo
3bet- JJ+,AKs,AKo
You can probably squeeze wider with like, AQ, KQ, AJ...
|
Reply With Quote