Well this should be interesting.
Pretty much the exact opposite of this for me:
1. Folding everything but pocket pairs and AK vs. the nit 4xing UTG.OK here goes for 1 to 3...
A nitty straight-forward player raises to 4bb UTG, you're in CO and BU is a loose passive who is likely to come along to see a flop. You are 100BB deep.
Call: TT-22,AQs-A2s,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,54s,43s,32s, AQo-AJo,KQo
3Bet: KK+,AK
Not folding JJ or QQ here, but also prolly not 3Betting either?
You're in the BB, and it's folded to BU, who is a solid winning TAGG. He opens for 3bb, SB folds. Again 100bb deep.
Call: TT-66,ATs-A7s,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,ATo,KJo
3Bet: JJ+,AJs+,KQs,AJo+,Kqo
You're on the BU, MP1 unknown opens for 3bb with 80bb, MP2 who is a reg calls with 120bb, CO who is a feesh with 60bb calls.
Call: TT-22,AQs-A2s,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s,54s,43s,32s, AQo-ATo,KTo+,QTo+,JTo
3Bet: JJ+,AKs,AKo
2. Probably flatting JJ+/AJs+ and 3-betting suited connectors and Axs and some small pairs, folding extremely small pairs.
3. Seems okish but probably squeeze a bit wider.
Reply With Quote