|
 Originally Posted by Openside
 I think you have found a hole in my logic. Based upon the premise that his 3bet range =/= his calling range, if we assign a 3bet range of 22+, AQs+, AKs+ (138 combos) and a calling range of QQ+, AQs+, AQo+ (50 combos) dont we have 63% Fold EV? ([138-50]/138).
Your saying his 3bet range = Calling range, deduced from his bet sizing?
I am missing something here. If Fold EV = (3betRange-CallRange)/3betRange, if we increase his 3bet range our Fold EV increases. How can increasing his 3bet range make it "more of a fold"?
ok a couple of things
1st - its fold equity no fold ev
2nd- While he may be 3betting 8% and not stacking off with that whole 8%, its highly unlikely he is doing it with that sizing, so unless you have seen him 3bet this size with the bottom of his range, then i would not assume this is like 22 here.
3rd- on a similar note, unless you have seen him 3bet/fold this sizing before i think its a lot safer to assume he is never folding to a shove
4th- Kmind is not just including 22-99 in his 3betting range, but also in his 4bet calling range. When examining our equity (pot equity not fold equity) we notice that as we add in more hands like 22-99 (hands that are beating AK preflop) then we have even less pot equity than if he just had TT+ AQ+ DUCY?
|