|
|
 Originally Posted by mojo
I'm not talking about what "is" legal.
I'm talking about what "should be" legal.
Fair enough, but then we're entering the murky world of subjectivity once again. And if someone plays the system legally but with questionable ethics, the problem isn't the individual, it's the system.
You don't reduce poverty by giving people food and homes and clothes. You reduce poverty by bringing the poorest and richest closer together.
We fundamentally disagree here. We reduce poverty by raising the standard of living, not by nerfing rich people so they become a little poorer, which in turn reduces income inequality.
|
Reply With Quote