Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Poker Forum › FTR Community ›

*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 9512

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 05-31-2019 04:04 PM #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    MadMojoMonkey
    MadMojoMonkey is offline AINT SHOVELING SHIT
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by oskar View Post
    What election interference do you think he was talking about?
    Don't change the subject. My thoughts on election interference are not the topic.


    Who's talking about election interference? Mueller.
    What did Mueller say? (watch the vid)
    What did the reporter say Mueller said? (watch the vid)
    Are those word-for-word the same?

    No.

    Ergo, the reporter was editorializing, or spinning the statement.
    Normalize Inter-Community Sense-Making
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  2. 05-31-2019 04:06 PM #2
    oskar's Avatar
    oskar
    oskar is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,019
    Location
    in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    Don't change the subject. My thoughts on election interference are not the topic.


    Who's talking about election interference? Mueller.
    What did Mueller say? (watch the vid)
    What did the reporter say Mueller said? (watch the vid)
    Are those word-for-word the same?

    No.

    Ergo, the reporter was editorializing, or spinning the statement.
    What possible election interference other than russian election interference could Mueller have been talking about?
    I'm not saying there isn't other election interference, there most certainly is, but which one of those do you think Mueller could have been talking about?
    The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  3. 05-31-2019 04:16 PM #3
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    MadMojoMonkey
    MadMojoMonkey is offline AINT SHOVELING SHIT
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by oskar View Post
    What possible election interference other than russian election interference could Mueller have been talking about?
    I'm not saying there isn't other election interference, there most certainly is, but which one of those do you think Mueller could have been talking about?
    My thoughts on election interference are not the topic.
    Normalize Inter-Community Sense-Making
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  4. 05-31-2019 04:33 PM #4
    Poopadoop's Avatar
    Poopadoop
    Poopadoop is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,445
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    My thoughts on election interference are not the topic.
    They're exactly the topic if you're going to accuse someone of putting a spin on Mueller's comments.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  5. 05-31-2019 09:26 PM #5
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    MadMojoMonkey
    MadMojoMonkey is offline AINT SHOVELING SHIT
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    What did Mueller say? (watch the vid)
    What did the reporter say Mueller said? (watch the vid)
    Are those word-for-word the same?

    No.

    Ergo, the reporter was editorializing, or spinning the statement.
    .
    Normalize Inter-Community Sense-Making
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  6. 06-01-2019 02:09 AM #6
    Poopadoop's Avatar
    Poopadoop
    Poopadoop is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,445
    Then you must not know what "spin" means. It means putting a biased interpretation on a story. There's nothing 'spinny' about mentioning that Mueller was referring to Russian interference. That's what half the report was about. Everybody knows that.

    "Spin" would be saying the report exonerates Trump because it doesn't indict him, giving the impression that he wasn't indicted because he was judged innocent, rather than that he wasn't indicted because it was against policy to indict a sitting POTUS.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules