*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[MadMojoMonkey]

To be fair, and assuming I understand this correctly, I think they're using a bit of bananalogic here. You don't know what their crimes rates are to begin with, so whatever number of crimes you attribute to illegals is already a wild guess. Half of a wild guess isn't really an informative figure is it?

I never said any specific number, and neither did nanners. He said that crimes by illegal immigrants is a reason he thinks the wall is a "best" use of our money to solve crime problems.
Whatever the number was at the beginning of the conversation, it's now half that.

[TheSpoonald]

Whatever the number was at the beginning of the conversation, it's now half that it needs to be re-calculated incorporating the new population data

FYP

[Poopadoop]

I never said any specific number, and neither did nanners. He said that crimes by illegal immigrants is a reason he thinks the wall is a "best" use of our money to solve crime problems.
Whatever the number was at the beginning of the conversation, it's now half that.

I don't think it works that way, but w/e.

[MadMojoMonkey]

I don't think it works that way, but w/e.

It's the direct quote from the author of the research. If you want to dig into the actual publication and examine his means and show that he's talking beyond the scope of the research, then I'm all ears. Otherwise... he's the expert that nanners chose and that's what the expert said.

[Poopadoop]

It's the direct quote from the author of the research. If you want to dig into the actual publication and examine his means and show that he's talking beyond the scope of the research, then I'm all ears. Otherwise... he's the expert that nanners chose and that's what the expert said.

lol, yeah I'm just saying that doesn't seem right on the face of it. Maybe in whatever context he said it it's right, but I don't really care enough to read the whole thing.