Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 2871

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    You don't know EXACTLY what Harris does or doesn't know or what K did or didn't do. You're filling in the blanks with your own/Fox News' best-case-scenario MadLibs.
    I never stated I knew EXACTLY anything.

    But OBVIOUSLY she thinks that BK talked to someone connected to Kasowitz about Mueller. That's all I'm inferring. I'm not saying who he talked to, what they talked about, why they talked about it, or what they did about the talk afterward.

    Why are you being such a cunt about this?

    What inference have I made that you specifically object to? Have I said anything that's not the MOST plausible inference?

    Do you realize that the next most plausible inference is that Harris made shit up out of nowhere and discredited an honest man merely for the purpose of generating face-time on television? Is that where you want this talk to go???

    What the fuck is wrong with you dude??
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    I never stated I knew EXACTLY anything.
    Oh sorry, when you outline such a detailed scenario as below I assume it means you think you know something about it.

    Kamala Harris obviously found some piece of paper that shows BK talking to some lawyer about Mueller. She obviously has reason to believe that lawyer works at XYZ law firm. XYZ law firm was founded by Lawyer X. Lawyer X worked for Trump for about five minutes in 2017, and then resigned.

    What Ms Harris is implying....is that there still exists some back-channel connection through this lawyer with which Trump currently has no client-relationship. And that Trump may be using that back channel to vet supreme court candidates.



    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Why are you being such a cunt about this?
    Pointing out the falllibility of your claims isn't being a cunt, sorry. It's taking you to task for having nothing to back up your claim.


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    What inference have I made that you specifically object to? Have I said anything that's not the MOST plausible inference?
    Why infer anything at all. I could infer Kav and Kas spoke for hours about a joint plan to let DJT pardon himself and take the next submarine to Russia. It'd be just as plausible to many people as your argument that there's a completely innocent explanation for why Kavanaugh would talk to someone on Trump's personal legal team about Mueller.


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Do you realize that the next most plausible inference is that Harris made shit up out of nowhere and discredited an honest man merely for the purpose of generating face-time on television? Is that where you want this talk to go???
    lol, no that's YOUR next most plausible inference. Like,it's either there's a totally innocent explanation where Kavanaugh unwittingly bumped into one of Kas.'s lawyers in the elevator and one of them was holding the NYT article that day about Mueller, and they both said 'interesting case' or some such, and now Harris is trying to make a big deal out of it, OR it's a deliberate attempt on her part to use lies and insinuations to discredit this wonderful person who thinks illegal immigrants shouldn't be allowed abortions.


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    What the fuck is wrong with you dude??
    lol.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    why Kavanaugh would talk to someone on Trump's personal legal team about Mueller.
    Source? Who says he talked to someone on "trump's personal legal team". Haven't you been ranting about how wrong it is to make inferences without facts? He talked to someone employed by Kasowitz. Kasowitz's was on "Trump's legal team" with regard to Mueller for less than 60 days. His firm has 266 lawyers on staff. How are you inferring that BK talked to "trump's personal legal team about mueller"?

    wonderful person who thinks illegal immigrants shouldn't be allowed abortions.
    Fake facts again. He doesn't believe anyone should be denied an abortion. He didn't think the government should be required to provide one, paid for, on demand, for a non-citizen. Not quite the same thing.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Source? Who says he talked to someone on "trump's personal legal team". Haven't you been ranting about how wrong it is to make inferences without facts? He talked to someone employed by Kasowitz. Kasowitz's was on "Trump's legal team" with regard to Mueller for less than 60 days. His firm has 266 lawyers on staff. How are you inferring that BK talked to "trump's personal legal team about mueller"?
    That was the question being posed to Kavanaugh, and one he adeptly dodged. So we'll have to wait and see what the facts are when they come out. Patience.


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Fake facts again. He doesn't believe anyone should be denied an abortion. He didn't think the government should be required to provide one, paid for, on demand, for a non-citizen. Not quite the same thing.
    Sigh. For someone who claims that the only reason people ever disagree with him is because they don't have the facts, it's becoming increasingly obvious that what you mean is they don't have the alternative facts.

    PLEASE try to get at least SOME of your information from an objective source.

    “It’s important to emphasize that it was a minor,” Kavanaugh began. “So she’s in an immigration facility in the United States, she’s from another country, she does not speak English. She’s by herself. If she had been an adult, she would have a right to obtain the abortion immediately.”
    The argument K made here had nothing to do with money. The argument was she wasn't old enough to make up her own mind. Never mind that the gov't denied her a sponsor for the first 18 weeks of her pregnancy so she wouldn't be able to have an abortion; that didn't seem to faze him much.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    The argument K made here had nothing to do with money. The argument was she wasn't old enough to make up her own mind.
    Ok, I read something else, but whatever. So she wasn't old enough. That's not his opinion. That's not something judges get to decide.

    The laws in the state say how old you have to be, and she wasn't old enough. That's a judges job.....follow the law. If you don't like a law, a judge is not the person to talk to about it. That's something you libtards don't seem to understand. You're all anti-fascist, but you also think that one guy in a robe should be able to just give you your way all the time.
    Last edited by BananaStand; 09-07-2018 at 03:05 PM.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Ok, I read something else, but whatever.
    Lol "I read some bullshit lies and believed them, but so what? I'll do it again and come on here and scream at anyone who says otherwise."


    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    The laws in the state say how old you have to be, and she wasn't old enough. That's a judges job.....follow the law. If you don't like a law, a judge is not the person to talk to about it. That's something you libtards don't seem to understand. You're all anti-fascist, but you also think that one guy in a robe should be able to just give you your way all the time.
    That might be a good argument if the opinion was unanimous. It wasn't. Clearly there was enough ambiguity in the law to make different interpretations possible. That's where a person's judgment and humanity comes in. And when you think a 17 year old girl can't decide for herself she wants an abortion, and the gov't won't provide her with a proxy to help in that decision, it's tough shit for her, then you're a cunt plain and simple.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Lol "I read some bullshit lies and believed them, but so what? I'll do it again and come on here and scream at anyone who says otherwise."
    No, I read actual excerpts from one of BK's opinions. It must have been a different case.

    That might be a good argument if the opinion was unanimous.
    LOL, you might be right if there was no such thing as an activist judge.

    Clearly there was enough ambiguity in the law to make different interpretations possible. That's where a person's judgment and humanity comes in.
    NO!!!!!!! That's where CORRUPTION comes in.

    Good judges rarely see ambiguity in the law. The law says what it says. If you want the law to say something else, pass a law that say something else.

    And when you think a 17 year old girl can't decide for herself she wants an abortion
    I doesn't matter what anyone "thinks". What matters is the law. You could make the same argument that says a 17 year old girl can decide for herself to have sex with her math teacher. SHE CAN'T

    it's tough shit for her
    There are plenty of cheap abortion clinics in Mexico. She's welcome to go there any time she wants.

    then you're a cunt plain and simple.
    Then I'm a cunt.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •