Yeah you have a valid point, we should deport the likes of Jimmy Savile, too. Anyone know a country that wants our baby rapers?

The establishment are worse than the Muzz. Let's talk about percentages. I'm not going to do any googling, I'll just pull a league table of baby rapers out of my arse...
1. British Royalty, politicians, and celebrities
2. Middle Eastern & African immigrants of a religious nature (aka Muzz)
3. Aston Villa fans
4. Working class white British people
5. East Asian immigrants

I'd quite happily set fire to anyone who willingly covered up for Savile.

Anyway, I appreciate my trolling is cutting close to the bone here, so let's point out that you're missing a rather large point. Actually two. You're assuming I'm saying ban all Muzz because there's a higher percentage of baby rapers amongst them than in normal society. I'm not. I'm saying don't let them in because they have utter contempt for our way of life and have absolutely no intention of integrating. I'm pointing at things like Rotherham, Sweden, Germany and all the other places infested with dreadful crime as a consequence of "cultural enrichment" as examples of what happens to societies when immigration gets out of hand. What happens is we get the worst of the third worlders, the ones who abandon their families and nations, and crime goes through the roof. The evidence is abundant, but anyone who dares point to it is accused of racism. No wonder they feel invinisble.

The other point you're missing is you can't deport British people to somewhere other than Britain. Sadly, gone are the days where we can dump our convicts on random islands. What you can do though is refuse to allow in a group of people who hold western values in contempt. What's the problem there?