|
|
Statements like: the udssr was a humanist society or that the roman empire was secular, make me question whether you understand what those words mean, or if you know anything about the historic context or both, and secondly even if it was true, you'd still have to show causation.
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
It was neat to see Adams compiled the main points he was making back before anybody outside of a handful of people were saying that Trump was doing very big things regarding NK.
Almost none of those points are true or make sense, except the ones related to tweets I guess. I'm not going point for point because obviously the core of his strategy is to drown the reader in so much bullshit that it would take an overwhelming effort to refute it all. But how about this one:
"used visual persuasion of captured tankers" - what does this refer to and how does it relate back to Trump?
|
Reply With Quote