*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[oskar]

Statements like: the udssr was a humanist society or that the roman empire was secular, make me question whether you understand what those words mean, or if you know anything about the historic context or both, and secondly even if it was true, you'd still have to show causation.

It was neat to see Adams compiled the main points he was making back before anybody outside of a handful of people were saying that Trump was doing very big things regarding NK.

Almost none of those points are true or make sense, except the ones related to tweets I guess. I'm not going point for point because obviously the core of his strategy is to drown the reader in so much bullshit that it would take an overwhelming effort to refute it all. But how about this one:
"used visual persuasion of captured tankers" - what does this refer to and how does it relate back to Trump?

[wufwugy]

Statements like: the udssr was a humanist society or that the roman empire was secular, make me question whether you understand what those words mean, or if you know anything about the historic context or both, and secondly even if it was true, you'd still have to show causation.

Rome was a mix of secular and religious. The idea is that an increase in secularization associates with its decline.

The historical impact of humanism includes an uplifting of the human being above all else. This was one of the base components that gave socialist regimes their credibility.

Almost none of those points are true or make sense, except the ones related to tweets I guess.

They make sense to me.

"used visual persuasion of captured tankers" - what does this refer to and how does it relate back to Trump?

I've posted about this in the past. Getting somebody to associate an idea, person, or event with an image is a more powerful way to influence what he or she thinks about the idea, person, or event. It's a tactic that Trump is fond of using.