Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
No, you said that his drunken rantings are hearsay, and unusable in court. And that there must be other independent evidence (presumably related to the drunken rantings) in order for Pops to be in trouble. But actually Pops is in trouble for something else entirely.
Which undermines your whole complaint that the Aussie diplomat was biased.

Fuck you must get dizzy from spinning around in circles.