I am uninterested in what Kimmel, Seder, or Cassidy say about the bill or say about healthcare in general. I care about the facts and about the good economics and statistics reasoning that helps explain the facts. The points made by the three people I mentioned don't include much of that.

Here's an example: the majority discourse includes the idea that the bills supported by Republicans will reduce the amount of people who receive healthcare. This is wrong. The idea comes from a narrow and inappropriate examination of one statistic that does not explain the whole. The questions you want to ask are "how" and "if that, then what else happens?" The Obamacare mandates have made it so that technically more people have health insurance than if the only thing that changed is eliminating the mandate and the only response is whether or not to buy health insurance. But those are not the whole story. The real story includes things like how a very large proportion of people who are covered under Obamacare insurance don't actually get any healthcare since Obamacare has made their deductibles so high, so the dichotomy that is commonly used in the media, that more coverage = more healthcare, is not necessarily true. Another thing the real story includes that media doesn't address is that much of the Obamacare coverage comes from people who would rather not pay for the coverage being forced to pay for the coverage. There are many, many other things along these lines, but I'll stop here.