Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

The Wall

View Poll Results: The Wall, for or against?

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • Go Wall!

    3 27.27%
  • No Wall!

    8 72.73%
Results 1 to 75 of 511

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I really never get tired of being right.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...port-says.html
    the early results show that enforcement matters, deterrence matters, and that comprehensive immigration enforcement can make an impact.
    This has been my point all along. We don't need a wall. We just need to enforce the law so that it becomes exceedingly difficult for someone to cross over here, and stay here, prosperously. If there is nothing for them here, they will stop coming. No wall necessary.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    I really never get tired of being right.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...port-says.html


    This has been my point all along. We don't need a wall. We just need to enforce the law so that it becomes exceedingly difficult for someone to cross over here, and stay here, prosperously. If there is nothing for them here, they will stop coming. No wall necessary.
    Lol, those are some pretty exact numbers. How do they count illegal border crossings anyways, is it just the ones they manage to catch?

    It is nice that Fox News always agrees with you though. That must feel very good.
    Last edited by Poopadoop; 03-09-2017 at 10:03 AM.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Lol, those are some pretty exact numbers. How do they count illegal border crossings anyways, is it just the ones they manage to catch? .
    Clearly you didn't read it. Right after those exact numbers, it refers to "apprehensions". So yes, it's just the ones they catch.

    I guess when the stats say that alcohol is worse than meth....they're irrefutable facts. But if the stats say that immigration enforcement works....it's "lolz, how are those numbers so exact??!!"

    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    It is nice that Fox News always agrees with you though. That must feel very good.
    Seriously, fuck off with this.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Clearly you didn't read it. Right after those exact numbers, it refers to "apprehensions". So yes, it's just the ones they catch.

    I guess when the stats say that alcohol is worse than meth....they're irrefutable facts. But if the stats say that immigration enforcement works....it's "lolz, how are those numbers so exact??!!"
    Hey good point. So they caught less people trying to immigrate illegally. Well done I guess.




    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Seriously, fuck off with this.
    Ok, Fox News never agrees with you. Is that better?
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Ok, Fox News never agrees with you. Is that better?
    God damn it you're an ass hole
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    God damn it you're an ass hole
    Want some fries with that salt?

    If you keep quoting Fox News like it's some respected source of information, you can expect to be called out on it. This isn't r_thedonald you're on here.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Want some fries with that salt?

    If you keep quoting Fox News like it's some respected source of information, you can expect to be called out on it. This isn't r_thedonald you're on here.
    How do I "keep quoting" Fox? What % of links that I provide come from Fox News? Go do the math.

    Because I read it and you don't that makes it an invalid source of information?

    BTW, it IS a respected source of information, that's why their television ratings far exceed those of any other news source. And it's not even close.

    Seriously go fuck yourself if you're gonna keep playing this game where everything that comes from Fox is declared invalid. Either post why you disagree with the article, or shut the fuck up.

    You're hopeless and unmovable bias is causing you to see only what you want to see.

    And this isn't an opinion piece, or an editorial. It's a reporting of facts released by Border Patrol. No spin, no bias, nothing but the news. If CNN doesn't report it because it doesn't fit with their narrative, THAT's the news source you should avoid.
    Last edited by BananaStand; 03-09-2017 at 11:11 AM.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    If you keep quoting Fox News like it's some respected source of information, you can expect to be called out on it.
    ^This is pure, unadulterated, ass-hole-ery right here. This is you concocting a justification for ridiculing me.

    How often do I quote Fox News?

    Why should I expect to get 'called out' (which, apparently, is a nice way of saying 'shit on') whenever I cite them?

    Seriously, tell me what the rules are? Where is the list of poop-approved sources that are allowed in this thread?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •