|
 Originally Posted by CoccoBill
I understand that's the premise, but I can't find any proof of that actually happening. There seems to be a huge variance in the performance of American schools, and on average they're not achieving good results at least based on standardized tests. My intuition says that competition makes the best better and the worst worse, since being on the short end automatically cuts funding, limits the available expertise and creates a social environment that makes it very hard to achieve results.
You're definitely right about there being huge variance. The US system has very little choice, so it isn't choice causing this variance.
|