|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
I'm all for free speech, but he has to realize that not everyone has to listen to him.
You are completely correct, not everyone has to listen to him. But still, free speech is free speech, we should not opress the voices of those we don’t like because we don’t want our voices be opressed as well. Let him speak, and those that don’t want to listen, will not listen, as no one forces them to listen anyway. By making something harder to access to, that is when you make people want to search more for that which is forbidden.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
If he gets canned from Breitbart because his antics are costing them advertising dollars....fuckin' c-ya Milo. You'll get no sympathy from me. Same thing with CPAC and whatever else he's caught up in. These things don't exist just to be Milo's soapbox. If the people running CPAC feel that Milo's message is not consistent with theirs, or if his presence will bring negative attention to what would otherwise be a positive event....fuckin' c-ya Milo.
This is the tactic of the SJWs, to shitcan the income of those they don’t like. This can backfire greatly. Plus, I will defend his right to speak his shitty mind forever.
Milo isn’t toxic per sé, definitely not more toxic than the Richard Spencer dude. Let him speak, ridicule his speech with actual facts and factual points, make people know WHY you dislike him and what he is speaking is such shit.
Never gag. Gagging means you can not win the argument, ergo your own position is weak AF.
#nevergag
|
Reply With Quote
