Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Let's Talk About Population Control

Results 1 to 66 of 66

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    JKDS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6,780
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    popping by to say two things.

    First

    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post

    History tells us that everything we now believe to be true displaced another explanation which was quite similar, but ultimately wrong, but which we believed to be true right up 'till that one raging nerd wouldn't shut up about it. It's only a matter of time until the next raging nerd comes along and shows us how ever so slightly wrong we are, now.
    Thats awesome, and I've never heard the history of science explained like that before. Its totes true though.

    Before I get to my next point, heres a distraction!



    Alright alright. Second point.

    I strongly believe, and studies give some support to this, that we are not creatures who are maximizing our utility...but instead minimizing harm. You might say that minimizing harm = maximizing utility, but I disagree. The difference is in the means...because at the end of it all...we're not trying to obtain good things...but avoid bad ones.
  2. #2
    rong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    9,033
    Location
    behind you with an axe
    Quote Originally Posted by JKDS View Post
    popping by to say two things.

    First



    Thats awesome, and I've never heard the history of science explained like that before. Its totes true though.

    Before I get to my next point, heres a distraction!



    Alright alright. Second point.

    I strongly believe, and studies give some support to this, that we are not creatures who are maximizing our utility...but instead minimizing harm. You might say that minimizing harm = maximizing utility, but I disagree. The difference is in the means...because at the end of it all...we're not trying to obtain good things...but avoid bad ones.
    This is the only reasonable alternative to utility maximization I've ever heard. It's effectively the same thing, but technically different and equally as plausible.
    I'm the king of bongo, baby I'm the king of bongo bong.
  3. #3
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    Quote Originally Posted by JKDS View Post
    I strongly believe, and studies give some support to this, that we are not creatures who are maximizing our utility...but instead minimizing harm. You might say that minimizing harm = maximizing utility, but I disagree. The difference is in the means...because at the end of it all...we're not trying to obtain good things...but avoid bad ones.
    Sure, but still. It's one of those things where you should pay attention to the idea of utility maximizing, pay attention to the idea of harm-reduction, and pay attention to a lot of other plausible ideas. Don't get married to one easy-to-serve idea.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •