**** Elections thread *****

[wufwugy]

i don't have any problem with an increase in privacy protection in that regard. an accusation alone shouldn't be enough for it to be legal to intrude into somebody's life except in the most superficial way.

[spoonitnow]

an accusation alone shouldn't be enough for it to be legal to intrude into somebody's life except in the most superficial way.

My argument isn't legal, it's moral. There is likely a ton of legal support for my side here, but I'm too lazy to research and point it out.

I disagree with the notion that anything can be bargained for. Even assuming equal power and information, I think there are some things that shouldnt be contractual. An investigation into someone's sex life is one of those things. This topic is arguably the most private thing that a person does, and the most worthy of privacy protection. I don't think we should be able to throw that protection away with such little evidence. If we're gonna enter this area, I want good cause. Signing this protection away wi th the stroke of a pen seems very wrong to me. "Allow the world to see into your last relationship or be expelled, btw you agreed". Yuck. I don't like it

This type of shit is one reason why fewer men are entering college than would have been expected at this point. It's an extremely hostile environment for men, on average. There's going to be a point where the market of women getting useless degrees with borrowed money is going to become saturated, and then they'll have to do something.