|
@ ong, start on page 1 again. fascinating stuff there. I won't be quoting as much on subsequent 100 post batches, but this is my summary on the first 100 posts...
wuf wagon launches right at the start then stalls with mmm/bid/me/key on it. My vote for wuf at this point was simply cos 'wuf wagon hell yeah'
post 15 = gabe's lynch ong for spew post – we should all be reading gabe's posts again with the knowledge that he's a villager. I always argue for doing this and everyone always says that the reads no longer hold cos of water under bridge. The water under bridge argument is stupid, obviously some reads will still apply.
Then you pushed a legit read on gabe = wolf (post 22 wrong, but whatever)
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
Wait, you know I'm a villager. There's no waiting to see what I do, there's no thinking that if I'm a wolf then I'm a liability to them, you're just picking off an easy target based on shit logic. Except you already slipped by showing that you know I'm a villager.
Oops. Your turn to spew?
, watch how quickly baudib jumps on it (post 25)
 Originally Posted by baudib
Think the only post of substance so far has been Ong's, that may have been a legit slip from Gabe.
then in post 28 claiming genuine alignment reads on 6 players wtf?! then again, he did seem to laugh at himself for it
 Originally Posted by baudib
I think I have 4 villagers so far. I have 2 other wolf candidates, and as much fun as it would be to lynch Wuf Day 1, I can't help to think at least 1 wolf jumped all over him.
yeah it's early
post 39 from rilla on game mechanics and player numbers is genuinely valuable to the village - would wolf rilla post that? dunno
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
No specials means only tone reads as wagons won't be particularly telling.
I'm betting the wolves aren't pair-bonded together even though that'd be the best of all scenarios.
OP lists 16 people, but has 14 villagers and 4 wolves (for 18), assuming a typo that's 8 pairs.
All wolves with another villager, 4 v-v pairs, 4 w-v pairs. Even though you know your own role, you don't know the value of your life with 100% confidence. Given nothing but tone reads to go off of, villagers are at worst .5 villagers, and at best .9 villagers as they can never really know for sure what their partner's role is.
Hopefully there's one complete w-w pair, so we can stumble into something as a village, otherwise it's a complete guess-fest brought to you by strained tone reads and wacky slip-analysis.
drew suggested full reveals
 Originally Posted by BankItDrew
Everyone should state their character name from the TV show theme. As well as who their lover is.
It's within the rules and will also provide information.
and then rilla pushed the same agenda but with reasoning added (while i disagree with the reasoning, i don't think that a players position pro- or anti- reveal is telling at all. It's highly likely that there are both villagers and wolves on both side of the argument).
then rilla/baudib and bid/mmm were both outed against ong and luco's wishes and baudib's 'might be against the rules' bullshit claim (bullshit cos jkds had already posted about it earlier in post 16
 Originally Posted by JKDS
ModCorner
You may identify your +1 in this thread..
plus it's unlikely that with rilla and baudib both thread active that rilla outed the partnership without discussing it prior with baudib in private).
post 57 basically 'rilla linking baudib and luco for their position on partner outing
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
If baudib turns out to be a wolf, I'm calling luco as a wolf.
meh, then the thread deteriorates into worthless game mechanics drivel it seems.
|