Already in Day #1, I have a feeling this is going to be an epic match.

daven mentioned the "yet another" comment that wuf brought up. I don't see the "slip" that's supposed to be there and it can't be a slip if I'm Villager (I promised no more V-V claims going forward so I'll leave that out... anything to get Kebored from using "kid" again). Post game we can discuss how "yet another" seems fishy when my WW history has been: (G1 - Wolf) (G2 - Angel) (G3 - VV) (G4... well I said I wouldn't mention it again).

I like the Keybored accusation of Keith even though I don't agree with his logic of why MMM isn't a dangerous fellow to have around late-game. Overall I'd just like to see Keith post more, but so far what he has posted is exactly in line with my thoughts on MMM. Keybored has made a direct plea to not lynch MMM Day #1. I'm making a similar plea to lynch MMM Day #1.

I'm a bit relieved to see the baudib-Keybored hi-5-ing from first hours has ceased. baudib's TINFOIL argument is interesting. Day #1 is so difficult and really anything is possible. I'm not really suspicious of those who don't want to continue the MMM wagon but rather frustrated by it, as everyone off MMM's wagon can't be a bad guy.

As far as the wagon-alignment goes, I really disagree with Ong's analysis. If I were Wolf I'd be pushing equally as hard for MMM wagon. The fact is hasn't already concluded only confirms to me that there are true Villagers who are hesitant (again, they can't all be bad). That said, I'm still 100% for MMM lynch and will be disappointed if he's not the candidate today.

Prepare for plenty of bitching & moaning from me if I survive to Day #2 and he's still around. There's nothing more I can add to my arguments as to why he "has to go" as wuf put it. Knowing that there's at least a modest amount of Villagers not convinced of MMM lynch confuses me.