Just because only 1 person is questioning your dubious claims, that doesn't mean he's the only one who noticed they're dubious.
Keith is doing a fine job of asking reasonable questions and avoiding emotional involvement. I certainly agree with his skepticism toward your claims. I have agreed with his
line and his tone, so I haven't
felt the need to add to the thread. However, if you're going to interpret my silence as agreeing with you, then I must step in.
So far in this thread, you have made a wild claim, and given no verification to your wild claim. Why
open the topic if you're not interested in explaining yourself? Do you expect us to blindly agree with a claim that is contrary to common sense? (I'
m not saying common sense is always right. I'
m saying that it takes a bit of explaining if you want to change someone's mind.)
This is a distraction from the point. We're not curious about why other people do what they do. We're curious about what you did, and what happened because of that.