|
|
 Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Okay, then my question would be that since the unions aren't the one doing the hiring, so why should they be able to get people fired for not being a part of the union? If someone doesn't want to be a part of a union, why is it fair for the union to get them fired for it?
can they actually get people fired? from the three seconds I've spent reading on it it sounded like the most a union can require is that you pay something towards the collective bargaining (which isn't allowed to be more than the union dues of a member), the rewards of which you are of course reaping.
Are employers allowed to pay non-union-member employees less than union-member employees working alongside them?
|
Reply With Quote
