Operation Winning is a Habit

[supa]

Gotta go hydroponic bro. It's the only way.

[Robb]

Here's a graph using a filter for hands where the pot > 80 BB. Guess this makes me feel better. You can see the big ass tilt session starting about hand 130. The red line starts dipping first. I was getting run over and had to make some big laydowns, then tilted and spewed. Still, except for that session, I'm generally making good decisions in the big pots.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Robb]

The small pots are break even, the medium 50 - 80 BB pots I'm down $13. Any ideas on what that means? I think the medium-sized pots are steady negatives because I'm avoiding bad spots to jam, and the small ball is break even because I'm stealing enough and avoiding trouble.

Thoughts?

[daven]

The small pots are break even, the medium 50 - 80 BB pots I'm down $13. Any ideas on what that means? I think the medium-sized pots are steady negatives because I'm avoiding bad spots to jam, and the small ball is break even because I'm stealing enough and avoiding trouble.

Thoughts?

filter again adding vpip = true
then run similar filters but instead of absolute pot size do something that sorts by how many bbs you put in the pot

gardening is great. Where hipsters/hippies/farmers/depression era old people meet!

edit: also - i haven't been in touch with spoon for a while, but then i read things like this Math doesn't suck, you do.

[Robb]

thx daven - rookie mistake, but you know what? I'm just happy being back at the tables!

[Robb]

ok, w/ filtering done right:

• vpip = false, I'm down $25 ( - 27 BB / 100) over 2.3k hands
• vpip = true, hero committed < 25 BB to pot, I'm up $21.36 (28.2 BB / 100) over 1.9k hands
• vpip = true, hero committed 25-50 BB to pot, I'm down $3.21 over 90 hands
• vpip = true, hero committed > 50 BB to pot, I'm up $25.46 over 87 hands

Still I'm happy with the small ball, happy with the big pots, and not horribly behind in the medium pots.

[Robb]

Tough night. After posting above, I played 800 hands, down 2 BI. Just completely card dead, flop dead. Great deal of fish at the tables, all of whom pwn'd the shizzle out of me.

Played again after getting back from the bar, seeing off a friend who graduated and commissioned 2LT this weekend. Only had a beer, so I settled in for another grind, about 600 hands, up half a BI. Again, super-mega-retarded fish at all my tables, kept running into the nuts.

Didn't tilt. Had a wobble or two, but no spew-a-whirl tilt-fests.

[Keith]

looking at those stats above , it looks like you are running 45-50% VPIP. Is that solely a result of starting tables or are you tending to take the starting tables hand ranges to the full tables as well?
You should be able to filter by number of opponents to get your vpip, pfr ,3bet stats by number of opponents.

[supa]

Something that can kill a session for me is starting a table and not leaving if the table sets up bad. If a couple of 52/6's or chronic 3bettors sit down to my left it behooves me to get up and start another table.

I also find that fish want to sit next to me (HU) so if I sit in the bottom left corner they'll almost always be on my right.

I start playing like the tables full when 4 seats are full (including mine). The other 2 seats usually fill up quick and by that time I'm usually HU on another table which is taking more of my attn.

I'm sure you've thought about these things a lot but they seem to work for me.

[Robb]

Couldn't sleep. Got in another 45 minutes 2-tabling HU and 3-way, up a BI when I quit around 4 AM. The guy I destroyed was min-stacking, ~ 30 BB's. He just shoveled the flop every so often, so I looked him with A5 > 22 and then, about 10 hands later, A7 > 22. That surely tilted him. The win with A7 was four clubs to my 7c, a flush. I don't feel too bad about winning with those coin flip hands. I would grind him down to 1/2 to 2/3 of his stack, then we'd be all in. I lost several fo those "small" all-ins I was dominating preflop or way ahead on the flop.

looking at those stats above , it looks like you are running 45-50% VPIP. Is that solely a result of starting tables or are you tending to take the starting tables hand ranges to the full tables as well?
You should be able to filter by number of opponents to get your vpip, pfr ,3bet stats by number of opponents.

I think this is only somewhat caused by opening tables. I certainly play super-short-handed a ton, so that is skewing the results, a bit.

I try to adjust as folks join the table, tightening up as each new player sits down. I'm probably 80/55 (vpip/pfr) on the button HU, don't know BB because it depends on how much he limps. 3-way, I tighten up, as one player is often a complete unknown. 4-way, it depends. I'm still uber-loose compared to 6max, especially if I have good postflop reads on two of my opponents. I play standard once I'm facing 5 players.

Something that can kill a session for me is starting a table and not leaving if the table sets up bad. If a couple of 52/6's or chronic 3bettors sit down to my left it behooves me to get up and start another table.

^^^^^^ too true

I'm sure you've thought about these things a lot but they seem to work for me.

Yes, but it's good to know others are processing it the same way.

@Keith, I will look up some preflop stats later today. I have been playing lots of hands. Be interesting to see, I guess. Hope my backers aren't too upset I'm playing laggy.

[Robb]

Filtered for 5-6 handed. By the way, the laggy approach is intentional, not just "spillover" from super-short-handed. I was a 18/15 6max TAGG-nit during my successful early runs at 10nl, 25nl and 50nl, but got crushed at 100nl by the 25/18's.

I originally started playing HU to work on my postflop reads so I could open a bit in 6max.

In the past two weeks, obviously, I have opened up a great deal, and in the next couple of days I was planning to sit down and work on some standard preflop ranges by position. Still, I feel like I need a more wide open game, maybe 30/22-ish, at 4NL and 10NL, tightening up as I move up. That was the goal.

I think the stats below (are not a very large sample but still) show my SB play needs tightening up a good bit, amongst other things.

Thoughts?



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Robb]

HU, I'm 85/75 BTN (11 BB/100), 61/16 BB (7 BB/100). 700 HH. Up $4.90.

3-way, I'm 78/70 BTN (30 BB/100), 65/37 SB ( -15 BB/100), 40/15 BB (16 BB/100). 575 HH. Up $4.90

4-way, I'm 66/53 BTN (55 BB/100), 44/38 CO ( -64 BB/100), 52/31 SB ( -3 BB/100), 41/17 BB ( -29 BB/100), 690 HH. Down $5.30.

So...tighten up more 4-way, like Supa said. Work on less laggy approach to full table 6max.

I'm seeing some positives here, though we all have to realize its tiny samples, variance, etc.

[Robb]

That was a profitable 11 min break, up a BI.

I worked out at the university gym at noon with a group of faculty and staff. It's cross-fit style workouts designed by our athletic department's strength and conditioning coach. Then lunch at the Chinese Buffet, now home for a shower and back to work.

[Keith]

one obvious thing i saw was how do you get 26/16 UTG . thats implying an 1/3 of the time you put money in UTg you are limping in .Its not even as if you are limp 3betting since UTG 3bet is 0. Then once you do see the flop you only cbet it 2/3 times with what should be your strongest range.
same applies to a certain extent for MP.

overall it looks like you are playing 37/24 ish on a full table, giving up a lot of initiative and playing lots of pots out of position.

Up above you said that playing tag worked up to 50nl. Why try and beat 100nl opponents strategy by playing 4nl opponents. 4nl players won't play like the villains that you are trying to devise a strategy to beat , they
wont fold, float, 3bet ,bluff anything like the 100nl players so how valuable is the strategy you are trying to get to work.

i should add that my comments in this thread are to provoke thought/discussion and not meant as criticism or showing displeasure as a backer.

[Robb]

Up above you said that playing tag worked up to 50nl. Why try and beat 100nl opponents strategy by playing 4nl opponents. 4nl players won't play like the villains that you are trying to devise a strategy to beat, they wont fold, float, 3bet ,bluff anything like the 100nl players so how valuable is the strategy you are trying to get to work.

i should add that my comments in this thread are to provoke thought/discussion and not meant as criticism or showing displeasure as a backer.

I appreciate the comments, Keith. I've never limped before in my poker career, so honestly was just trying it out. I got into several tables during long sessions where it was a massive limp-fest every hand, and I must have limped UTG 50 times in one 4 hour session late Saturday night.

Small sample skewed by a couple of sessions, I think.

What have I learned? I just can't limp. It's not in me. I just like throwing chips in and saying "I've gotta hand. Come along to value town." And I don't see any good way to take the initiative back, even with a 3bet, once I've limped. So, experiment over. No more EP limping.

I'll report back later on some preflop stuff I'm working on, some "default" ranges that I plan to use, trying to build a preflop profile that is positionally aware and overall about 30/23. I'll post those. I am capable of remembering what hands are on bubble for my ranges, and easing them in out of the range based upon my reads of villains' at the table. But you need some sort of baseline for doing it, or at least I do. Something better than "Ooooooooohhhh, let's gamboooooool!"

I think a wider range can be played aggressively and skillfully for a profit at 4NL and 10NL, with plans to tighten up a bit more for 25nl.

There were some positive things about my game two years ago, three years ago. But there were some negative things as well. I played like a robot and was inflexible, an agro donk. I only could barrel and 3bet and 4bet and shovel. I need to look for "value floats," rather than raising Villain off his hand. I need to get those extra 5 BB's into the small pots playing an extra street, sometimes passively, from position. My old habits were based on some primal urge to "win" by getting them to fold. My new habits need to be based on reading tough spots better than my opponents, and using the "check" and "call" buttons, too. I need to find "thin value" and the fold button, as in use the check/fold more often and the check/raise less.

That's what I'm trying to accomplish with the laggy 4NL right now. And as I said, I've done enough limping now to say I've given it a real go, and it's just not for me. Raisy Daisy. Except postflop, where I'm weak-tight and passive a good more than will probably be optimal. But I feel like I need to experiment with other aspects of poker so I can include them effectively in my game.

[daven]

I have opened up a great deal, and in the next couple of days I was planning to sit down and work on some standard preflop ranges by position. Still, I feel like I need a more wide open game, maybe 30/22-ish, at 4NL and 10NL, tightening up as I move up.

hammer the fish, whittle down their stack, by the time the nit at the table flops a set the fish is down to 9bb and you're laughing also, fish seem to have less trust of the guy who is in most of the pots. be that guy.

[daven]

you limp and call more than is standard in a 'destroy dead money at the micros' gameplan. Doesn't mean it's necessarily bad, but it's definitely something you should think about. Once you have more data run a filter on vpip = true, pfr = false and run reports on types of hands (i.e. scs, s1gs, s2gs, Axs, small pairs, etc)

saying "I just like throwing chips in and saying I've gotta hand. Come along to value town."

man, i need to work on this instead of "I just like throwing chips in and saying i've got two cards and that's about all i or anyone else is certain of". Obviously my value(?) late street raises allin get called more often than those of most, but i should probably be winning more of those showdowns..

I think a wider range can be played aggressively and skillfully for a profit at 4NL and 10NL, with plans to tighten up a bit more for 25nl.

Agree completely. I mean, it seems that the last month or so 26-20 can definitely be played profitably at fullring 25nl-100nl, so it should win at 4nl 6-max...

I need to get those extra 5 BB's into the small pots playing an extra street, sometimes passively, from position. My old habits were based on some primal urge to "win" by getting them to fold. My new habits need to be based on reading tough spots better than my opponents, and using the "check" and "call" buttons, too. I need to find "thin value" and the fold button, as in use the check/fold more often and the check/raise less.
But I feel like I need to experiment with other aspects of poker so I can include them effectively in my game.

very nice. Something to remember about thin value = if you aren't losing at showdown after your river value bets get called about (?) % of the time then you're missing a lot of value.

when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?

[Robb]

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: $6.62
Hero (UTG): $4.84
CO: $4.00
BTN: $1.91
SB: $1.41

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has K K

Hero raises to $0.11, fold, BTN raises to $0.22, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.59, BTN calls $0.37

Flop: ($1.24, 2 players) 9 T 7
Hero bets $0.82, BTN raises to $1.32 and is all-in, Hero calls $0.50

Turn: ($3.88, 2 players) A

River: ($3.88, 2 players) 6

[spoil]Hero shows K K (One Pair, Kings) (Pre 84%, Flop 29%, Turn 18%)
BTN shows 7 T (Two Pair, Tens and Sevens) (Pre 16%, Flop 71%, Turn 82%)
BTN wins $3.69
[/spoil]

[Robb]

Note: in hand above, Villain was 70/30/0.8. It's hands like these that have me questioning the (short term) value of All-in EV (adj). You're playing against a range, and even though we got the money in behind, we're pretty stoked to play this line against this range all day for 50 BB.

Just had a 300 hand session, after working on my preflop. I ran 29/19 w/ 3b = 8%. I think that's right at my target.

Here's the work I did. These are the way I would default against an unknown. Reasons for loosening up: LP vs "steal from me" nits to my left, good read on someone I can outplay post (and position), a chance to play (even oop) against a cally-wally fish, limpers/stations to my right already involved. Reason for tightening up: Loose passive to my left, Loose-passive in blinds or super-agro 3bettor in blinds.

Hero's PFR Ranges:
UTG (11%): 88+,AJ+, ATs, KQ, 76s - T9s (half), small pp's (quarter)
MP (14%): 77+, AJ+, KJ+, ATs, 76s - JTs, small pp's (half)
CO (30%): 22+, A8+, Any 2 T+, K9s, Q9s, Axs, 65s - JTs, 97s - J9s
BTN (50%): 22+, ANy 2 8+, Ax, Kxs, 54s - 87s, 75s - 97s

I use my preflop cards to randomize the "half" and "quarter" combos above. Way too "fancy" for 4NL, right? Oh, well, it's practice for later, and may be -EV at 4NL. But not too much.

There's a ton of uncertainty in the blinds, but I was consciously tightening up. The BTN range seems pretty wide. May help to know I'm min-raising OTB, raising 2.75 BB MP/CO and raising 3.5 BB UTG. Steal success is right at 50%, which pays for itself, and playing a wide, weak range in position causes opponents at this level fits.

That's the plan for the next thousand hands. Thoughts?

Also, on Black Chip you start at "2 High" VP level, working up to "Ace High," with rakeback (trade in VP's for cash) kicking in at "7 High." I'm about 1/3 the volume needed (lifetime) to get to "7 High." At this rate, I will have achieved rakeback well before the bonus ends. Obviously, would love to move on up so that I get more than the starting level 15% rakeback.

The lifetime format is perfect for me. As long as you play at least one hand every 60 days, your VP's don't deteriorate. I get plenty of volume per year, but rarely can sustain volume per month as needed, for example, on Full Tilt a couple years ago.

I'm loving the PT4 HUD, and will defo buy it when the open beta concludes. I use the Merge icons to tag villains, and those show up in the lobby. I can immediately tell how fishy a table is and see if the seat I get is good or bad based on the known players at the table. There's plenty of fish every hour of the day, with 11PM - 3AM (Eastern US) agro-fishy and best, 5PM - 10PM tight-passive fishy, and every other hour seemingly loose passive fishy. Plenty of tables even at the nano's to bum hunt.

Starting tables rocks. It's high variance, but I have a nice game plan and can alter it to fit my opponents. Usually, the plan is to out-LAGG them with small ball and hope for a big hand to stack them once they've lost all respect for me. If they let me steal/cbet enough, I can "finance" my shots at the big pots, making the big laydowns and jamming when I look to be ahead. If they can LAGG it up with me, well, it's high variance, but it's what HU is all about. Still gets my heart rate up and the adrenaline pumping. Love that bare-knuckle brawl feeling to agro-donk HU play.

[WeaselT]

no doubt we'll be butting heads if we haven't already .

[Robb]

no doubt we'll be butting heads if we haven't already .

That's fun, when you see someone post a hand in the BC that you played against them, and they're like "I know he's full of sh*t here at least half the time - he's a total donk-fish-tard..."

[Robb]

Left dinner at a pub and pulled out, drove half a block wrong way on a one-way street. Total brain freeze. Blue lights lit up immediately. Got off with a warning. Whew!

[Robb]

Speaking of brain freezes, I accidentally played 3 hands of 10NL this afternoon. I am in technical violation of my staking agreement. I misclicked and joined a 10NL table along with 3 4NL tables. Should have realized it when it asked for a bigger buy-in than normal, but I was up big on a couple of tables, then sat out, then rejoined. So I thought it was a 4NL where I had been running good.

I paid the BB, SB, folding both hands, and folded the BTN when I saw the blinds and thought, "Oh, crap, you bonehead!" Left table immediately.

So the "driving the wrong way on a one-way street" isn't all that out of line for brain freezes today. In my defense, the town I live in has about 4k year-round residents, half a dozen stop lights, and like three one-way streets that are one-way for about a block each. It's not Chicago or New York where every freakin' street downtown is one-way.

[supa]

lol, brainfreeze must be going around today. Not doing much better.

Re: playing 30/22. It's taken me a while to figure out that playing too laggy at the fishy micro games on Cake is a mistake but taggin' it up a bit seems like it's better there. Merge is obv not quite as fishy and it may work better there. It seems like playing with that wide of a calling range is a mistake though. We still have initiative in these games whether the fish understand it or not. I think we also have a ton more fold equity in bigger pots HU or 3way than in small pots with multiple callers.

*edit* Meant to say you obv have a better understanding of ranges than me so laggy should work better for you.

[Robb]

Lost 1BI Wednesday and 3 BI Thursday, didn't play yesterday until late, picked up 3/4 BI and went to bed.

Why did I lose 4 BI? Of course, the reason is (as everyone expected) that I was playing wide/weak ranges in almost every spot. But I wanted to find the cause. Why was my laggy game working fine a week ago but was off the rails last two nights?

The realization hit me yesterday while gardening. I started out playing the laggy ranges on tables of uknowns, or "slightly knowns" gleaned from table starting. The site is still dominated by TAGG wannabe's and post-flop weak tighties. So my laggy approach was fine (maybe not best, admittedly, but fine).

As I've got the HUD optimized and worked on table selection, I focused on the fish (65/15's), the maniacs (45/35's), and the LAGG's (35/25's). I try to sit down with position on a couple, leaving TAGG wannabe's on my left.

I suspect everyone but me foresaw the problem: now I'm on loose, action-filled tables which are absolutely PERFECT for a TAGG approach, and I'm not playing TAGG-std poker. I'm ldo if you want to play laggy, table select to find nits, TAGG wannabes and weak-tighties. If you're table selecting laggy, why not open a small strong range of hands and camp on the nuts? Only open up when (if?) you stop getting action.

So I've learned some things this week:

• Play the game you've table-selected for, dumbass!
• Reversing, I can table-select for the game I want to practice.
• I'm very much aiming at mid 20's vpip, not 28+
• I need to work on calling ranges.
• I am still (relative to my opponent's) very good HU, and need to focus on that rather than "volume" during sessions, especially where I'm running bad. Go with what works.

A few observations about my learning process in the coming weeks:

1. Frustrating that FTR has devolved to the point where folks will say "fold pre/ldo he hazz a King" when you post a J9o btn flat HH in the BC, but when you ask for help on preflop flatting ranges, the thread goes silent. We used to have experienced players who would explain their reasoning. I wonder if the new era of one-liners has been ushered in by a general lack of friendliness I also notice in the BC lately. Bashing seems routine, not quite flaming, but "tough love" certainly.
2. Certain players I respect are disrespected these days on FTR. I can mention half a dozen, but I'll just mention Spoon. WTF? He was an ass, but he always willing to explain his reasoning and help others. But now he's gone? Wonder what happened? And now his advice is disrespected, too? WTFF?
3. Since I can't get help in the BC, I went elsewhere and worked a ton on my own, especially about flatting ip and from the blinds. I will report some of what find over the coming days. Also, this "equity" idea is often bullshit. Just because you have equity doesn't necessarily mean you have playable hand.
4. I got tons of help from Keith who typed up some notes from some things he's been working on during a mini-challenge where he's playing the nano's for a while. I appreciate his help, but (unfortunately for me learning when and how to flat/float), his notes focus more on aggression.

And a bit of a rant:

Sometimes, I'm a real dumbass, I admit it. But I am tired of "poker platitudes." I've seen so many different styles work, from nitty to laggy, and work over tons of hands. I've decided I'm going to take what I know and what I feel I do best, and experiment like crazy and do the maths and work on ranges and villain profiles and get my HUD in order, and I'm going to put together a game of Robb-poker, combo by combo (Shania?), position by position, merged range by polarized range. I'm going to do it at the nano's and improve it by tweaking it as I move up.

I don't give a flying furry what people think. I've been inhibited about what to post and how to play for too damn long. It doesn't matter if anyone on FTR or in the BC is impressed with me, it just matters if I win and know why the hell it's happening, so I can fix the problem(s) when I'm losing. I want a flexible game that can open up or tighten up when needed, and understand how to use all aspects of game play to win more: aggression, passivity, table selection, villain profiling, table starting, not tilting, br management - the whole deal.

There's a problem with being a BC-trained robot, with a TAGG-std game you don't understand because you've never properly studied, and the problem is that you get up around 25nl/50nl and you can no longer beat the games you're playing in. That's not gonna be me.

When I get to 25nl again, I'm gonna be there strong, winning and wise.

[Robb]

Oh, just read Keith's whole email (it was LONG), and there is some great advice on flatting. So I am including that in my work/study.

[!Luck]

I think many would disagree with me. But damn, why make shit harder on yourself. If you weren't staked, I wouldn't say what I am about to. But, with a stake your goal is to win money.

Who cares if you understand merging and balance at 4nl? Play a style that will yield profits. Learn when you have to. Make poker accretive.

Get a base of 13/11 or whatever the current style is. Then add one concept at time and only 1. Master it. Then move on. If you are .5ptbb/100 winner at 25, with a very unimaginative game, if you add just one simple concept you can increase your winrate, while still earning monies.

Also, it looks like you don't even like poker and get bored easily. You like the theory of poker, but the practice is boring, and who doesn't love some grade A mental masturbation?

[dranger7070]

I hate spoon as a person with every fiber of my being, but his poker advice is still solid. Can't believe people disregard it nowadays. I rarely (never) go into the BC anymore, so I can't honestly say I've seen the bashing taking place, although it wouldn't surprise me.

FTR isn't what it used to be... If the games come back online in the US for major sites, I can see it picking back up, MAYBE. But until that happens... bleh.

I disagree with Luck, play the game you want to play it. If you're winning, that's all that matters. No need to play the 'standard' way. People change the mold of the game by playing non-standard. TAG used to be abnormal back in the day!

[supa]

It's easy to disregard Spoons teaching because his lessons were hard. We've been given an out in the BC and the weaker of us have used that out. It was hard to post a hand when he was around because we always had to devise a range for villain (gasp, like how could that ever help our game). IDK, I'm an idiot and lazy.

I know you want to help the BC Robb. I've read many of your posts and as you know have linked the BC to them a few times because I think they have merit. Maybe a way to help get the BC out of it's current funk is to take a stand and help posters understand why ranges are needed when they post. It won't be easy and you'll get some flack about it but it might be worth it in the long run.

[WeaselT]

Shit went downhill after BF. Anyways, dont wanna be out of line but yeah I think paying off that stake should take priority.

There is a time for being good at LAGG and I think it comes at around 25NL/50NL+. You don't have to be a "TAGG ROBOT" at the micros, you still have a brain and can use it. BUT tight works BECAUSE of how loose everybody else is. The fact is you CANT MAKE THEM FOLD, so you gotta have the goods more often than not. You can still grind it up tight and work on LAGGY shit on the side. I dunno 4NL just doesnt seem the place to try to be well rounded player. Do what works UNTIL it doesnt, then work on fixing it.

I suspect everyone but me foresaw the problem: now I'm on loose, action-filled tables which are absolutely PERFECT for a TAGG approach, and I'm not playing TAGG-std poker. I'm ldo if you want to play laggy, table select to find nits, TAGG wannabes and weak-tighties. If you're table selecting laggy, why not open a small strong range of hands and camp on the nuts? Only open up when (if?) you stop getting action.

Mad respect tho, I probly read everything you posted back in the day. GL whichever way you decide to go.

[kickass]

who is bad mouthing spoon? I think people just started to 1st with put him on a range, when it was completely fucking dumb. Spoon had a method he knew what he was talking bout but the folks that sucked his dick to much ruined the point of a beginner posting, if putting villain on a range was easy then we'd already know the answers to our questions well before we had to ask em. the BC at the min is a body without a head, almost everyone who posts regular is a fish, with the exception of Daven prolly, so when you post a difficult question (one with a fuck tonne of variables) us fish dont know how to respond, telling you to fold J9o to an UTG open is easy; telling you a good calling range depends solely on the range you give your opponent and how he plays that range, which is obviously much fucking harder. I don't know why people are so obsessed with playing in a style, play to exploit the villains at yr table; if you don't know how; move.

[Robb]

With a stake your goal is to win money.

You're right - I need to consider this more. Maybe I could get to the same goal via a different learning route.

Also, it looks like you don't even like poker and get bored easily. You like the theory of poker, but the practice is boring, and who doesn't love some grade A mental masturbation?

I think I disagree, but again, I'm considering. I'm glad you posted. We only learn things by hearing different perspectives, and considering them.

I really think I actually like playing poker, though I certainly get distracted easily, and bored easily, too. That's part of my personality you have nailed perfectly. In fact, that I'm still interested in playing poker 5 years after first starting is about the longest I've kept up with any hobby or interest in my life apart from running.

By the way, !Luck, don't you live near Atlanta? Or did once upon a time?

[Robb]

play to exploit the villains at yr table

^^^^^

[Robb]

dont wanna be out of line but yeah I think paying off that stake should take priority.

Whatever way I go, I'm going to spend a ton of time learning and understanding, not just blindly following advice. By the way, I'm willing to follow advice, just not without understanding, too.

I think there might be an obvious compromise. My stakers want me learning, as all the work will pay off soon enough. Maybe play 4 of 5 sessions TAGG standard, doing the things that work well for me: opening tables, playing super-short-handed, finding fish and nut-camping. Then, 1 of 5 sessions, find tables of weak-tighties and open up a good bit, not crazy loose like I have been, but say 26/20 or 28/24. Find a few spots to flat call and work on those ranges, but nothing crazy.

That way I would be pushing the boundaries and trying to play marginal hands in marginal positions, but only a small percentage of the time. I would learn a lot, and earn a lot, too (hopefully).

Good thoughts, everyone, I will take it on board and report back with a plan. I think the plan tonight is to watch our girls' softball team try to make the Division 2 NCAA World Series for the fourth year in a row. Game is at 5 PM EST. Here's the link to the live online video for anyone interested:

Saints Broadcast Network, Ustream.TV: Welcome to the official home of the Saints Broadcast Network on Ustream..

Series is best 2 of 3, with Flagler winning last night, 8-2, and us winning earlier this afternoon, 3-0. Game 3 for the right to be in the Elite 8 for the fourth straight year, especially impressive as this is a rebuilding year for us with only 3 seniors in the squad. First baseman and 5-hole hitter Katherine Martin and substitute and #1 pinch runner Katie Garrett were students of mine, and got me interested in going to lots of games and supporting the team.

After I get back, it's baths and bed for the kiddos, then a couple of hours of poker. I think I will start it off with a half hour or so work on ranges, then a more subdued approach to my TAGG-bot. I like the idea of playing at tables with an ass ton of lagg-tards, but I need to nit it up if I'm going to do it.

[Robb]

who is bad mouthing spoon?

It's not badmouthing, it's a respect thing. Certain posters I know who deserve more respect aren't getting it. And I would still like to know what happened to Spoon, so I mentioned him. Did he leave voluntarily? Or did he get canned?

I can imagine either scenario, just wondering. Could not disagree with anyone who hated him, as he was the ultimate douchebag, but he was an integral part of learning in the BC for several years, before he was a mod and then after his "I wanna be a mod" campaign actually worked out (which shocked the crap out of me - never thought it would actually happen).

[WeaselT]

I believe he went off to do what he does, teach math. No moar pokerz.

[dranger7070]

Cant remember if he wuit before BF, or shortly after. I dont play much anymore, but when I do get the bug, I read through his strat posts almosr exclusively.

He definitely deserves respect for that much.since he pretty much.single-handedly turned me into a winning player.

Good l

[!Luck]

Nope, midwest is my home.

[Robb]

OK, decent-ish session last night, up a BI, ran 2 BI's behind EV for over an hour after AK < AJ (all-in pre) went xxxxJ for 125 BB's. I can't believe I was so dumb, as the table selection is perfect for nut-camping and the VERY occasional exploitation. Wow, they're chucking chips around the table like its confetti on New Year's Eve, and all I have to do is wait for my Aces to get cracked.

Also working on my 3k-th post. I'm going to do a Mike Caro, like the probability tables in the back of Super-System (first one), just calculating a bunch of funky probabilities I enjoy playing around with and asking for a "stump me" series of questions. Get your weird probability questions ready. I'll do better with gambling and gaming questions, but I'll take a stab at anything you come up with.

Spoiler: Show

I'm going to put all the maths inside spoilers to avoid scaring the noobs, if I can figure out the tags to do it right!

Aha! Looks like I got it figured out.

[Robb]

Just played this vs WeaselT (sorry!)

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 3 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: $2.40
Hero (BTN): $3.61
SB: $4.02

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has A 3

Hero raises to $0.08, SB calls $0.06, fold

Flop: ($0.20, 2 players) 3 A 7
SB checks, Hero bets $0.13, SB raises to $0.35, Hero raises to $3.53 and is all-in, SB calls $3.18

Turn: ($7.26, 2 players) K

River: ($7.26, 2 players) 4

Spoiler: Show

Hero shows A 3 (Two Pair, Aces and Threes) (Pre 54%, Flop 58%, Turn 73%)
SB shows 4 6 (One Pair, Fours) (Pre 46%, Flop 42%, Turn 27%)
Hero wins $6.90

[Robb]

OK, finally got the HUD setup so that it displays stats only from the ssh'd tables I've played against opponents. I have separate filters for HU, 3-way and 4-way, then normal HUD for 5+ opponents. It's perfect for starting tables, as I can see how folks adjust - one thing they do is tighten up way too quickly as the table goes 3-way.

Not perfect for full table play, especially when you play 4-handed for a couple rounds as players leave and the table refills. Lose a bunch of info.

@WeaselT - what time zone are you in? Maybe we could voice chat while playing a couple of tables, do a sweat? We obv can't talk about hands that we're in until they're over, or its collusion. And we can't see each other's screens for the same reason. But we could just talk through hands after they get played, see what the other person thinks about how we played a particular hand.

Just for starters, I have you at 90% plus "folds blinds to LP steal," so that means I've opened up a ton against you when I'm OTB. Two 3-bets (light, if need be) within about 4 rounds will shut me down big time, force me to tighten up. If I 4bet, it's a hand, maybe a bit wider than AK+, KK+, but not much. Now, that's a small sample, but still it's the read I'm reacting to and why I'm so agro when you're on my left. You can also flat big hands and let me value town myself as I'm firing a bunch of cbets after you call preflop and check it to me on the flop.

I have you running 13/11 over 115 hands of 5-6 player hands. A bit nitty, though you play nice and agro postflop, which is good. If it's working, great. As you get more comfortable, you can open up a bit. My first (profitable) stint at the micros, I ran ~18/16 overall, extremely tight UTG/MP, opening a good bit on the BTN and somewhat in the CO. Do what works.

Sorry I stacked you. I do play my best against friends, though I stayed at the table longer than I would have since I had stacked you and didn't want to hit and run. Look for spots to stack me back. You should use everything you know about my game that I've said in this blog against me. There's tons of meta-game now when we face off, and you should use it to your advantage. Defo sit on my left if you find me at a table, and look for spots to use my aggression against me. You can check/call when you hit a hand with a villain like me behind you, someone who is extremely likely to cbet air, especially when acting last and the action is HU on the flop.

My tactics HU and 3-way, as you saw, focus on agro small ball and position, in tons of pots, betting and raising - and folding. I don't play for stacks all that much, usually folding a couple of medium-sized hands while winning a dozen smaller hands. I want other folks to get tired of my agro play and start shoving weak and medium hands on me, trying to get me to fold all my "junk," so I can pick up a hand and look them up or jam. If you play me super-short, look for something to stack me with. If you don't have a big hand, don't play for stacks, and make sure you're the one shoveling with the 9-out draw, not calling.

And let me know if you wanna try some kind of sweat session. PM me and we can exchange some notes on villains and so forth.

Good luck at the tables!!

[Keith]

should the weasel hand have been a weasel fold pre.. In essence he's playing pre for a flush/straight draw and from your comments .....if the board comes out connected in that way it's unlikely that you 'd pay him off. It just happened that you connected well with it as well.

[WeaselT]

Yo, haha np on the stack :P. Thoughts on the hand anyone? Been runnin about 15/12 this month (9BB/100 tho). Nitty for sure I know. Last month was more around 18-20/16. Was pretty meh. I'm an ex FRer for now so I'm working hard to break out of my nitty shell.

As for that short session, I was kinda stuck between your aggro ass and those stationy fellas behind me. Wasn't seein shit for cards and didn't feel like gettin into it with you with my garbage. Didn't get to see much postflop play so I wasn't sure what to do with you. Thx for the tips tho will defo keep that in mind next time. The A7o hand was lulz tho. I get paranoid if I run into any FTRers at the table (trying not to do anything stupid). Was still trying to feel you out. Generally I do start getting active with the 3bets vs. habitual stealers.

I'm in Poland with my wife right now visiting her family sooooo Euro time zone? Leaving tomorrow tho back to the US. Mountain Time, Colorado. Would be down for some sweats/discussion for sure. I'll PM you some shit and once I get back to the states we can hopefully get on that.

[Robb]

should the weasel hand have been a weasel fold pre.. In essence he's playing pre for a flush/straight draw and from your comments .....if the board comes out connected in that way it's unlikely that you 'd pay him off. It just happened that you connected well with it as well.

Quite certainly, yes it's a fold oop. I like it fine for a raise on the button 3-way against nitty villains, though it's a bit laggy even for me.

Weasel, playing supper-short-handed, it's a game of trash hands. 2nd pair is the flop nuts, and we even cbet 3rd pair more often than not. We're using pot control, trying to get a bet or two in when good, ditch when we face resistance. Big pairs are what we need to play medium and big pots. Otherwise, we have to fold to any raise and most bets.

The key is get reads. What does he do when I raise a cbet? When I 3bet him oop? ip? When I call then donk the flop? When I 3bet and auto-cbet a dry board? a wet board? All the stuff your HUD can't tell you.

You find lines he likes to play with a hand. Say I'm facing a typical TAGG-reg villain HU. I've pfr'd and cbet three times on flops that have no high cards, and the last two he's check/called and led out on the turn. I folded. OK, that's his "I can beat your junky hand" line. If he's smart, it's as weak as top pair or 2nd pair + good kicker and will soon include some air to "play back at us." Now, a few hands later, I pick up KK and the flop come 8 4 2. I'm using that line again, and raising the turn all-in except for an A, 8 or completed flush draw. I'm hoping he thinks I'm so agro donk I'd do it with 4x or A5.

You watch how he reacts to flush draw flops when he's the pfr, and when you are. Any time you've played a certain way, and he's run over you - probably with air - but it beats your air so you fold. You're noting that. He's labeled that my "weakass" line. OK, now I've got AsKs and a flush draw, let's use that line and then jam all-in on the flop with 15 outs (and maybe not even behind at all).

There's more to it, but those examples give you an idea. The flop is easy to play if we start with cards 8 or higher in our hand and hit the flop. The flop is really hard to play with two low cards whether we hit the flop or not. So super-short-handed we want big card value. You can play a lot of Ax, Kx and Qxs that you would never play at a full 6max table. And you can't play some low "implied odds" hands, including small pp's which are almost worthless HU unless you flop a set.

[DoubleJ]

...just read Keith's whole email ... and there is some great advice on flatting.

care 2 share?

[DoubleJ]

Then add one concept at time and only 1. Master it. Then move on.

can you break this down, plizz?

wot would be your list of priority concepts for the micro-bonk?

[DoubleJ]

...help posters understand why ranges are needed when they post...

i sooooooo need someone to do this

[kickass]

when you post a range, it shows what your thinking bout through out the hand (its an embarrassing thing to have your range torn to shreds let me tell you) then folks with better poker brains can tell you where your going wrong. it makes a fuck tonne of sense but sometimes folks just want to know what villains range is cos they don't got a klue then when every fucker and his dog is like durrrrrr put villain on a fucking range and you go fuck you bc ima fuck off to 2+2 or some other shit for brains forum. nobody gets better but some folks get to feel oh so important cos they said the range thing first. ima drunkard

[Robb]

care 2 share?

It's Keith's to share, as he put it all together. I will post some graphs that he suggested and what I think I'm looking at.

The rough outline is a target of 24/22 TAGG approach to 6max micros, and obviously not flatting much. Get rid of hands like Axs, sc's and small pp's EP and MP, 3 bet a goodish amount in LP, steal and defend the blinds with raises instead of a wide calling range.

can you break this down, plizz?

wot would be your list of priority concepts for the micro-bonk?

Me?

Let's remember that it's still the micros, where the majority of players are too passive. Even the "TAGG's" call too much. So you have to have hand at showdown to win. That means:

1. Play tighter preflop
2. 3bet more preflop, call less
3. Learn to abuse position, steal with a wide range, and above all to get away (fast!) from hands that can lose big postflop with only potential to win small
4. Cbet flops less oop, more ip, and avoid c/r's without a real hand
5. 2-barrel air next to never, and only with a really solid read that villain can FOLD
5. Learning to bet/fold in the right spots on the turn especially can earn/save lots of $$

[Robb]

i sooooooo need someone to do this

Here's a thread I started some years back: Practicing Ranges

I use a chunking method of grouping hands together to make 5% chunks. The system is simple enough I can use it at the tables, and helps me think about what Villain can have.

I don't know if this answered the question, tho? I can post some thoughts later in this thread if you make the question(s) more specific.

Here's some links for Double J:

Lesson 4 Noobs and The Noobie Never Do This List. Two short threads about basic "correct" plays and big mistakes I make at 10nl. Lukie's List of Exploitable Habits asks FTR regs to state one of their habits that thinking opponents could exploit. Great thread since most common leaks are addressed, and done so by FTR icons like Rondavu, pgil, DaNutsInYourEye, mcatdog, renton, jackvance, biondino, givememyleg, and pyroxene. Find leaks in our own game or exploitable tendencies to use in the Reg Wars.

I just grabbed those from the first page of my op thread, and there are others. Like these:

BJaust wrote a series he called "Thoughts on Beating the Micros." Each one is worth a read.
Thought 1, Thought 2, Thought 3, Thought 4, Thought 5, Thought 6, and Thought 7

Anything else I can direct folks to? I've been around a long time, and at various times haven't taken time to organize some of the best content on FTR. Why reinvent the flat tire? Some olds threads are dated as the games have changed, or new games (like Double-or-Nothing SnG's) have been invented. But many of them are still golden advice especially tailored to the micros and the new player.

[Robb]

i sooooooo need someone to do this

Here's a fun hand. Put villain on a range, and see why it matters. And this one is pretty routine. Villain is 47/30/1.8 over 30 hands, with 9% 3b (1 of 11 opportunities). I think, if you get this range right, we're betting for value on the river and hating life if he shoves over the top.

Turn and River are beautiful cards, since Ax, sc's, pp's and two overcards makes up so much of his range.

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

CO: $4.10
BTN: $5.34
SB: $4.14
BB: $4.11
Hero (UTG): $8.20
MP: $3.74

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has 9 9

Hero raises to $0.14, fold, CO calls $0.14, fold, fold, fold

Flop: ($0.34, 2 players) T T T
Hero bets $0.22, CO calls $0.22

Turn: ($0.78, 2 players) 4
Hero bets $0.39, CO calls $0.39

River: ($1.56, 2 players) 3
Hero bets ??

Spoiler: Show

Hero bets $0.78, CO calls $0.78

Hero shows 9 9 (Full House, Tens full of Nines) (Pre 72%, Flop 82%, Turn 91%)
CO shows 8 A (Three of a Kind, Tens) (Pre 28%, Flop 18%, Turn 9%)
Hero wins $2.97

I'll post more of my thoughts tomorrow. The river is interesting if he shoves. On only 30 hands, can we soul read enough to call?

Off to make my 3000th post!

[Robb]

From Keith's suggestions, I have 11.4k hands for the following filters.

1. Filter for 3bets preflop - graph should be steady upward profit.

Check. I have 354 3bets, +$20 profit, +$1 from showdown, rest from non-showdown. That's 141 BB/ 100 win rate. My 3b ~ 8% in 5- and 6-handed action (8% of possible opportunities, ~3% of total hands).

2. Filter for cold call = true. Should be a profit, if not, too much trash in range.

Check - sort of. I'm up ~$7 over 941 hands (19 BB/100). But I'm running way ahead of EV which -$16 ( - 44 BB/100). A glut of "big" suckouts are probably masking how horrible-bad my ranges are here. I'm down $22 in non-showdown pots, up $30 in showdowns. With bad luck on the river, I'm shipping a huge amount of chips here.

I've already adjusted here. I've tightened up the flatting ranges in all positions, and I'm attacking the fish/maniacs by folding more, 3betting more and waiting for good spots. I don't really flat premium hands, so the way to play is raisy daisy (ip) or fold the crap right damn now (all positions).

3. Filter pfr = true. Should be solid positive up up garph. Blue line and Red line should be upward trends.

Check. 2.9k pfr's, + $37 (31 BB/100), and that's 2 BI below EV. Won with showdown is break even, profit is the red line. When I filter for 5- and 6-handed, both Red and Blue are very strong positive gainers. Short-handed, I'm losing a ton with the Blue line, but I'm nearly $30 below EV, which is positive. Wheee!! You feesh are way ahead of me, but I'm a comin' back!!

4. Check for 60 < fold to 3bet = true < 70.

I'm at 73.3% fold to 3bet, so I'm a bit high. At 70% or more folds, Keith points out, opponents can 3bet any two cards and show a profit.

5. SB reraise steal and BB reraise steal both > 10% (actually, Keith's point is slightly more nuanced, but it would take a while to build the filter needed, so I'm doing the quick and dirty version):

Check. SB 3bet steal = 17% and BB 3bet steal = 14%.

6. Filter BTN 1st to act, should be 50-60% pfr

Check? My pfr in this instance is 71%. In my defense, I table select hard, and try to get nits to my left and agros to my right. When I don't have the right table, I go start a new one or find more fish. Still, something to think about, as I'm wide open to any light 3bet from the blinds, probably why my 3bet calling percentage is so high. I'm just playing trash a lot from the blinds. Still, big upward garph, so I'm not being exploited, yet. That will surely happen a level or two higher, though.

7. Flop cbet success should be approaching 42%, definitely not lower than 40% (cbetting too much), not higher than 50% (cbetting too little).

Check. I'm at 40.5% success. Can cbet a bit less, probably. Garph is up up up, with Blue up moderately and most of the $$ from the Red line, as expected.

Thanks, Keith, that was informative. For anyone keeping score at home, there was a lot more in the message. I just listed the filters and graphs Keith suggested along with the "what to look for."

I'm headed for bed. I'm feeling confident and happy with my game. I've tightened up (though not as much as some have suggested). I ran about 29/23/2.6 since my realization on Thursday when I decided to tighten up. I see two positives.

First, all my days of winning 6max before Black Friday, I was AF > 4. I had no diversity to my postflop play, and value-towned myself a good bit. I'm working hard to add the thoughtful check/call, the check/behind, the pot control and other things that make me harder to beat postflop. Calling may seem an odd thing to want to add in, but seriously, I just used to bet/bet/bet, raise/raise/raise and fold/fold/fold. I'm getting a lot better at adding (a little bit of) trickiness to my game by simply letting agro players bet themselves into trouble against me. I'm not slowplaying big hands, just looking for good opportunities to float serial cbettors when I'm likely way ahead, and maybe even float again on the turn. An AF ~ 2.5 seems like a major improvement to me. I know I hate playing against the 2.5's postflop, as they're very hard to trap and difficult to run over, too. When they call 2 streets, I'm sweating.

Second, I'm hitting the ranges I was hoping for. I've never played this wide open before, and the last three days seem like a comfortable spot. I could tighten up more, surely, but I can also play this loose and stay aggressive. With the action players to my right, and nits to my left, I'm happy to play a lot of pots, flat a bit more and 3bet small and aggressively when there are opportunities.

Jeez, it's bed time. Good luck at the tables, people!!

[Robb]

One more thing. Steal success is 45%, and I'm min-raising on the BTN. Anyone know good range for steal success numbers?

Earning 1.5 BB's nearly half the time I bet 2 BB's seems like it's almost financing itself, and I'm way better postflop than most of the villains I play.

Thoughts?

[DoubleJ]

Put villain on a range, and see why it matters.

firstly, thanks for doing this robb.

secondly, let me clarify that I understand entirely why it matters. I just can't feckin' do it. Yet.

OK, here goes.

I reckon villain calls PF with JJ-22,AQo-A8o,KQo-K9o,QJo-Q9o,JTo-J9o,T9o,AQs-A3s,KQs-K7s,QJs-Q9s,JTs-J9s,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s

then calls Flop and Turn w/ the other T (KTs,QTs,JTs,KTo,QTo,JTo,T9o),any boat (JJ,99-22) and prolly any A (AQs-A3s,AQo-A8o).

OTR you are 4:1 favourite over this range

He will shove with quads, and depending on whether he's thought about what you have, he will likely shove all PPs and poss the Aces too.

Thoughts? Comments?

[Robb]

firstly, thanks for doing this robb.

No problem! Thought of your post when I played this hand, as I was spinning through the combos on hyper-speed trying my best to narrow this range.

I reckon villain calls PF with JJ-22,AQo-A8o,KQo-K9o,QJo-Q9o,JTo-J9o,T9o,AQs-A3s,KQs-K7s,QJs-Q9s,JTs-J9s,T9s,98s,87s,76s,65s

then calls Flop and Turn w/ the other T (KTs,QTs,JTs,KTo,QTo,JTo,T9o),any boat (JJ,99-22) and prolly any A (AQs-A3s,AQo-A8o).

I think your preflop range is excellent. We could argue over a combo here or there, but what's the point? His range is wide and includes exactly the types of hands you're talking about.

I think there are a few more Aces in his range than you listed, and I think he'll call down with all of them. I doubt he's shoveling with them on the river. In my opinion his shovel hands are Tx, QQ+, and maybe A3, A4, 99 or 88.

The awesome thing is that he can't have most of them. As you mentioned, preflop makes the QQ+ less likely. I think QQ is in his flatting range, but not AA or KK. We can't eliminate them entirely, but we discount them heavily. Tx hands are eliminated in two ways. First, it's incredibly rare to flop quads, though most of us have done it. The Tx hands are a huge part of his initial calling range, but shrink massively after we see the flop. And for me, the turn really rules out the rest of them.

On the turn: I thought about this bet quite a lot. I decided to bet small hoping he'll raise with a Tx hand. He's capable of it. I don't think this entirely rules of Tx, but it made me feel like I was ahead heading for the river.

On the river: how much do you trust your turn read? It's rare that the river can't change anything, so the turn is money - or its wrong. I think Villain has Ax, small/med pp's here mostly. But I don't think he's stacking off with them. And he's certainly stacking off with the nuts or QQ+.

So pot control is perfect - get some chips in to get value from the range that will call down, and fold if he aggresses.

[DoubleJ]

I think your preflop range is excellent.

Cheers, but can't take credit - it's all Dan Harrington.

The process, I mean. He's not standing here telling me what ranges to put villains on.

Unfortunately

...I was spinning through the combos on hyper-speed trying my best to narrow this range...

This is what i need to learn to do now.

Funnily enough, your 'chunking' post was one of the first ones i ever read on FTR. However, it's only now that i'm beginning to really understand it.

The chart that you reference - is that still available somewhere? The link is busted.

[Robb]

The chart that you reference - is that still available somewhere? The link is busted.

I have been going through various computers and finding various fragments of my poker study. It's not very organized as I just quit after Black Friday. I used to know where all the important bits and scraps and spreadsheets were. I'll post it if I find it.

By the way, I can only manage ranges at the table if I think of hands in groups. I filter through the groups, guessing (your estimates get more accurate with practice) at the combos left. I can often get the range narrowed down to fewer than 5 hands by the river.

I need to practice, too. I'll see if I can find the chart and then post some HH's here in my op thread where I do the exercise, posting my own thoughts as a spoiler.

[Robb]

Two big leaks I'm working on, thanks to Keith's suggestions and some thoughts I've had. (Can you tell I'm at work with a 3 PM meeting and totally bored until then? Already worked out...maybe lunch? That'll kill 45 minutes!)

1. Plan for the hand. I'm good at planning up through the first flop action. OK, I'll 3bet light and check most flops if called. That's usually a decision informed by the HUD reads on opponents left to act, stacks, position and so forth. So it's a decent decision. My leak? I have no coherent plan for when he flats/floats, c/r's the flop, or c/c's and then checks the turn.

I play tighter when I concentrate on how I will proceed on various boards. What if I get called and the board is wet? Dry with no high cards? Often, with stations left to act, it's tempting to open/call too wide. This, I think, is where my spew-looseness begins. When I think about one more step in the plan, I find myself folding preflop more often. This is especially true when I think about flatting preflop. A lot of the hands I'm calling with are trouble spots waiting to happen, and I can win more by tightening up and thinking through the turn.

Solution: Plan your hands, donk!! Stopping clicking likes it's a video game and think for 3 seconds before acting.

2. Put villain on a gah-dang range. Srsly, dammit. I can put villain on a range with some success postflop, if I work at it. The problem comes when too many tables have postflop action at the same time. I narrow the range, act, then forget everything I just figured out. I go to the other table, figure out that range, then get back to the first table thinking WTF? He called. Ah, crap, what was that range again?

Solution: Be willing to play fewer tables. When I table select right, I have two or more agro-donks to my right, and the action can get really intense with every other hand going big and/or multi-way. If the bets are getting tossed around like dollar bills in a strip club, close down a table or two and focus on the big hands I'm involved.

By the way, the list of my leaks is too long even for one of my posts. But one that I'm happy I'm not repeating from "back in the day" is mass-tabling. I've been 3- or 4-tabling, and I'm comfortable with that.

One plan for studying is to 2-tabling while looking at some villain stats in the HUD, and taking more notes. I don't have to do this a lot for it to pay off big.

[Robb]

DJ, here's the file:

Poker Ranges

Each area is ~5% of all poker starting combos, and they are arranged (roughly) on the page from top (stronger) to bottom (weaker) in terms of their playability in HU, imo.

I'll do some work later and find a hand or two to go through and try to post one.

[Robb]

Here's a thread I started some years back: Practicing Ranges

I use a chunking method of grouping hands together to make 5% chunks. The system is simple enough I can use it at the tables, and helps me think about what Villain can have.

I don't know if this answered the question, tho? I can post some thoughts later in this thread if you make the question(s) more specific.

Here's some links for Double J:

Lesson 4 Noobs and The Noobie Never Do This List. Two short threads about basic "correct" plays and big mistakes I make at 10nl. Lukie's List of Exploitable Habits asks FTR regs to state one of their habits that thinking opponents could exploit. Great thread since most common leaks are addressed, and done so by FTR icons like Rondavu, pgil, DaNutsInYourEye, mcatdog, renton, jackvance, biondino, givememyleg, and pyroxene. Find leaks in our own game or exploitable tendencies to use in the Reg Wars.

I just grabbed those from the first page of my op thread, and there are others. Like these:

BJaust wrote a series he called "Thoughts on Beating the Micros." Each one is worth a read.
Thought 1, Thought 2, Thought 3, Thought 4, Thought 5, Thought 6, and Thought 7

Anything else I can direct folks to? I've been around a long time, and at various times haven't taken time to organize some of the best content on FTR. Why reinvent the flat tire? Some olds threads are dated as the games have changed, or new games (like Double-or-Nothing SnG's) have been invented. But many of them are still golden advice especially tailored to the micros and the new player.

I would also start here, with ISF Fold Equity. Below the article are links to ~30 articles, about 15 of which are ISF's. You can learn a ton of poker by reading Danny's stuff.

[DoubleJ]

DJ, here's the file:

Hi Robb - problem w/ accessing this - i've PM'd you

Thanks

[Robb]

Hi Robb - problem w/ accessing this - i've PM'd you

Thanks

Should have this fixed. Let me know if link is still denying access.

[DoubleJ]

fixed.

nice 1, Sir!

[Robb]

Wow, variance. Lost 4 BI's last night, in like 250 hands. Eight coin flips, lost all but two. AK < 77, AK < JJ, JJ < AK, AK < AJ (all preflop). I jammed ATs flush draw + overcard outs over JJ and couldn't hit. HU is high variance, as I recall saying, but I don't have to like it.

Running almost exactly 2 BI below EV as all losses were close to 50/50. You usually have fold equity when you shove preflop, especially against JJ/77 type hands, so I'm not too worried about spew. But I got so punch drunk from the race-losing I quit after a couple hundred hands. Couldn't tell if I was playing stoopid so I quit.

[Robb]

Fun card game at the gym yesterday. Way sore today. Pick an exercise for each suit, something like spades = pushups, diamonds = V-ups, hearts = burpees and clubs = lunges.

In case you're wondering, burpees are down to plank, up and jump (hands to ceiling), back down to plank, etc. V-ups are situps with leg raises.

I've been doing cross-fit style workouts with the North Georgia Athletics strength and conditioning coach Blake. We do normal lifting: bench press, curls, rows, overhead press. We keep the heart rate up by alternating with body-weight exercises like pullups, lunges, reverse lunges, planks, leg raises (or spell the alphabet), dips and so on.

The lifting is high rep and semi-cardio, but the body-weight stuff keeps the heart rate high so it's a good 40 minute core strength and conditioning workout. Each day is different.

So the card game yesterday. We had 6 lifts, and in between we drew cards and did however many reps the cards said. 9 of spades? 9 pushups. No drama. But we kept increasing the cards, drawing one, drawing two, until we got to five cards. You're really hoping for 2's full of 3's about this point in the workout, but I had a two pair (Q's and 6's) with a nice suit of spades for 22 pushups and 16 V-ups.

Fun way to spice up a workout, especially if you and a couple of buddies are sharing the deck. Every card gets discarded, so you can see your odds by checking the discards.

Abs and pecs are REALLY sore, as I did about 65 pushups (hate those damn spades) along with 25 dumb bell bench presses and these things called man crushers: pushup on barbells, hold plank one-handed for row on both sides, then hop up and curl into overhead press, then back down. Took me about five sets to get all 15. Wow.

Light workout today, sort of, focused on abs.

[Robb]

Wow, variance. Lost 4 BI's last night, in like 250 hands. Eight coin flips, lost all but two. AK < 77, AK < JJ, JJ < AK, AK < AJ (all preflop). I jammed ATs flush draw + overcard outs over JJ and couldn't hit. HU is high variance, as I recall saying, but I don't have to like it.

Thought on flop the downshwong was still on - thank you, river!

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BB): $5.17
UTG: $1.84
BTN: $1.94
SB: $4.30

SB posts SB $0.02, Hero posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has K A

fold, BTN raises to $0.14, fold, Hero raises to $0.44, BTN raises to $1.94 and is all-in, Hero calls $1.50

Flop: ($3.90, 2 players) 5 Q 4

Turn: ($3.90, 2 players) J

River: ($3.90, 2 players) T

Hero shows K A (Straight, Ace High) (Pre 76%, Flop 15%, Turn 16%)
BTN shows A Q (One Pair, Queens) (Pre 24%, Flop 85%, Turn 84%)
Hero wins $3.71

[Robb]

Well, the downschwong wasn't quite over. I'm up about 1 BI tonight, but running 3 BI's below EV. Typical cracked river aces pokers. Felt good. A couple years back, that would have tilted me hard. Tonight, I was wobbly for a just a few hands, then got it back online. I won't say I didn't tilt, but I didn't tilt hard and regained equilibrium fast.

[Robb]

Focus on the CO, who is 38/16/1.2. We can estimate his cold calling range by multiplying the gap between vpip and pfr by 2 = 2 * (38 - 16 ) = 44%. (When we look it up, it's 41%.)

We can use a 2x multiplier for quick cold call estimates on passive players, and 2.5x for TAGG's. It saves room in your HUD, and it's remarkably accurate - check a few villain's for yourself!

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

MP: $4.58
CO: $5.22
BTN: $4.34
SB: $4.55
Hero (BB): $2.80
UTG: $4.44

SB posts SB $0.02, Hero posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has 8 T

fold, MP raises to $0.12, CO calls $0.12, fold, SB raises to $0.52, fold, MP calls $0.40, CO calls $0.40

Flop: ($1.60, 3 players) 2 9 7
SB checks, MP bets $0.80, CO calls $0.80, fold

Turn: ($3.20, 2 players) 7
MP checks, CO bets $2.40, MP raises to $3.26 and is all-in, CO calls $0.86

River: ($9.72, 2 players) 8

Results

Spoiler: Show

MP shows 5 5 (Two Pair, Sevens and Fives) (Pre 52%, Flop 13%, Turn 5%)
CO shows 9 T (Two Pair, Nines and Sevens) (Pre 48%, Flop 87%, Turn 95%)
CO wins $9.24

Robb's Ranges

Spoiler: Show

Preflop
From the Chunking Sheet, I have his 40% cold call range as:

• Half Premium (exclude AA, KK, and AK, half chunk ~ 2.5%)
• All broadways (2 chunks ~ 10%)
• All Ax, Axs, and sc's 1-gap suited (2 chunks ~ 10%)
• pp's 22 - JJ (1 chunk ~ 5%)
• Kxs, Qxs (1 chunk ~ 5%)
• Connectors 9x: K9o, Q9o, J9o, T9o, 89o, T8o (1 chunk ~ 5%)
• Connectors 8x: 87o, 86o, 76o, J8o, 97o (1 chunk ~ 5%)

That's a 42.5% range - wow, he's just not folding anything!

After the second cold call, I narrowed this by getting rid of the bottom two categories. I think he'll keep the suited stuff 3-way, plus I don't think he can fold an ace or pp. So 32.5% range heading for turn.

Turn
This is where I narrow his range a good bit. He's so passive that I feel like he would check behind most of his draws. I'm pretty much down to 9x an 7x hands plus a couple pp's:

• 9x (narrowed from above hands): A9, K9s, Q9s, J9s, T9s, 98s, 99 (50 combos)
• 7x (narrowed from above hands): A7, K7s, Q7s, 97s, 87s, 76s, 77 (18 combos)
• pp's (AA/KK heavily discounted): 22, 88, TT, JJ, QQ (27 combos)

The interesting thing for me is that I was thinking 7x was a bigger part of the range, maybe 1/3. It's actually about 20% of his range when I count them.

I think MP can shove over the turn raise with a big 9x or better, and should fold otherwise. CO doesn't bluff 2/3's pot on the turn with air. MP has to feel this is going to showdown, as CO is not walking away from an $8 pot for only $.86 additional.

I know this - I'm glad I focused on CO and not MP, as I wouldn't have expected the 55 barreling the flop. I felt good about my read, with 9x the most likely hand, and 7x a distant second.

[DoubleJ]

DJ, here's the file:

I'll do some work later and find a hand or two to go through and try to post one.

Started going through some HHs today using The Sheet, and I think I'm starting to get it.

could use a few pointers tho, if you have the time

Cheers!

[Icanhastreebet]

A quick point it looks like you missed about cold calling. If you are cold calling OOP, you're going to lose money regardless. It's just a question of am I losing less money then I am by folding? If you are losing -20bb/100 in the BB when you cold call with a bunch of weak hands(Need a huge sample to check this) you are actually probably too tight still and some people will be like omg cold calling too much I should tighten up! This is obviously a huge mistake but beginners/mediocre and even some good players(from studies I've done) don't understand this at all.

[Robb]

A quick point it looks like you missed about cold calling. If you are cold calling OOP, you're going to lose money regardless. It's just a question of am I losing less money then I am by folding? If you are losing -20bb/100 in the BB when you cold call with a bunch of weak hands(Need a huge sample to check this) you are actually probably too tight still and some people will be like omg cold calling too much I should tighten up! This is obviously a huge mistake but beginners/mediocre and even some good players(from studies I've done) don't understand this at all.

Fair point. I will filter later by position, check again, report back.

[Robb]

Started going through some HHs today using The Sheet, and I think I'm starting to get it.

could use a few pointers tho, if you have the time

Cheers!

Like the HH with my complete notes (referencing the sheet) in the spoiler section right above your post?

I'm planning on doing this once a day, and posting the good ones. Not every hand we pick up out of the database is perfect for the exercise, but I'm committed to the task. I learn by putting these ranges together exactly what they look like and how weak they are.

I will post more of my range practice, as after a while I get to doing it quite quickly and accurately at the tables. Let me know what you'd like to see or have pointers on, and I will try my best. I'm learning/relearning, so I'm that good at it. But I do think it helps a ton, and I've learned a lot playing HU about reading hands when they open wide ranges.

[Robb]

Up a BI in two short sessions, one last night, one this morning. Thanks to this hand. Stats don't matter, he's tilting. And he's run this shove over line several times on me and others at the table. I stacked him HU originally for 1/4 BI to start the tilt, then he bought in bigger.

Merge - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: $4.74
UTG: $3.26
Hero (BTN): $3.12
SB: $2.88

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.06) Hero has 9 8

fold, Hero raises to $0.08, SB calls $0.06, BB calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.24, 3 players) 3 5 9
SB bets $0.16, fold, Hero raises to $0.44, SB raises to $2.80 and is all-in, Hero calls $2.36

Turn: ($5.84, 2 players) J

River: ($5.84, 2 players) T

Hero shows 9 8 (One Pair, Nines) (Pre 42%, Flop 80%, Turn 89%)
SB shows 5 K (One Pair, Fives) (Pre 58%, Flop 20%, Turn 11%)
Hero wins $5.55

[Keith]

any reason for being 78bb? Arent you potentially missing value against BB by not being 100bb deep with him?.

[Robb]

any reason for being 78bb? Arent you potentially missing value against BB by not being 100bb deep with him?.

Starting tables, I only have a 70BB stack. I play small ball w/ 2x BTN raises standard, and this adjusts the post flop pot-to-stack ratios more optimally.

I lost a medium pot to someone else at the table - this table started to fill up within the last 5 hands. I don't have the auto-reload set, so in my HH's you'll see lots of "non-standard" stacks. I usually manually reload whenever I'm below 60 BB.