Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

AA faces flop shove

Results 1 to 25 of 25

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    pretty sure he has a set approximately never here. I'd call and shrug if he has a flush.
    [00:29] <daven> dc, why not check turn behind
    [00:30] <DC> daven
    [00:30] <DC> on my hand?
    [00:30] <daven> yep
    [00:30] <DC> because I am drunk
    [00:30] <daven> nice reason
    [00:30] <daven> no further questions
    [00:30] <yaawn> ^^Lol

    Problem officer...?
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Donachello View Post
    pretty sure he has a set approximately never here.
    How come?
    [20:19] <Zill4> god
    [20:19] <Zill4> u guys
    [20:19] <Zill4> so fking hopeless
    [20:19] <Zill4> and dumb
  3. #3
    Shotglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,755
    Location
    feelin' allright
    Quote Originally Posted by EasyPoker View Post
    How come?
    Someone playing loose/passive isn't going to shove unless he thinks he has the nuts or near to it. Just because he's running 50/3 doesn't mean he's stupid enough to shove here without the flush or straight flush. With his PF stats I wouldn't be surprised to see AX or even 53

    Also, you cant assume that a loose passive will shove all in with a draw or weak overpair. They will call with less than nut hands. The flop shove range is completely different to the preflop limp call range.
    Scott, It looks like you answered your own question. Try to figure out what range that you really believe he'd shove with in this spot. Once you do that I think you'll see that it's a fold and not even close.

    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg View Post
    i'll never understand how anyone can go through life being sober.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Shotglass View Post
    Someone playing loose/passive isn't going to shove unless he thinks he has the nuts or near to it. Just because he's running 50/3 doesn't mean he's stupid enough to shove here without the flush or straight flush. With his PF stats I wouldn't be surprised to see AX or even 53.
    DC, was this your reasoning?
    [20:19] <Zill4> god
    [20:19] <Zill4> u guys
    [20:19] <Zill4> so fking hopeless
    [20:19] <Zill4> and dumb
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Shotglass View Post
    Someone playing loose/passive isn't going to shove unless he thinks he has the nuts or near to it. Just because he's running 50/3 doesn't mean he's stupid enough to shove here without the flush or straight flush. With his PF stats I wouldn't be surprised to see AX or even 53



    Scott, It looks like you answered your own question. Try to figure out what range that you really believe he'd shove with in this spot. Once you do that I think you'll see that it's a fold and not even close.
    we need over 37.7% equity vs his range for the call if the wine i've consumed hasn't disabled my basic math abilities. Against a range of overpairs, sets, every possible flush combination (don't these guys play any two soooted?) and pair+As, pair+Ks, we still only have 37.1%. Are there more likely hands we can put into opp's range that can tilt this to a call? Or can we remove stuff like 73s?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •