|
|
Nice, clear example illustrating the sense in employing some sort of bankroll management strategy.
 Originally Posted by spoonitnow
By doubling the number of buy-ins we use for our bankroll management in this dice game, we've cut our expected value in half for each roll which has a negative effect, but we've cut our risk of ruin down by a much higher factor.
Just to be clear, what is the negative effect here, exactly? It seems like the total expected value of the two half-sized bets is the same as the EV of the full-sized bet (though maybe I am missing some mathematical detail), so the only negative element I can think of is the time it takes to put your bankroll in action, in making/resolving the wagers.
|
Reply With Quote