AI w/JJJ vs Gutshot

[bhaley66]

Ya its the one based on 6max. But its so focused on assigning ranges and making distributions and such that its applicable to both equally well...and imho its better than T&P.

comments

1) ok i made a wording mistake here that i realized after i read your response. I dont mean that villain can see our hand and play perfectly. I just mean that IF he could see it, he wouldnt continue to our raise...so he'd be making a mistake based on the fundamental theorem of poker. It was a pretty terrible way to describe value betting on my part

That makes your first answer for this one bad...my fault again. sorry. We know hes calling with said range so what hands can we raise for value against that?

For your second answer...its an interesting way to go about it, but you have to account for the probability of each range occurring as well. I dont much like it for this question.

2) bingo

3) its certainly alot wider than just his range

1) I'm feeling pretty damn lost right now, would it be just a range where we have greater equity than his continuing range? If so, just drop AQ out from his continuing range and use that?

3) Not a clue, but I feel this will somehow correlate w/our raising range. So I need to figure that out first?

[JKDS]

1) I'm feeling pretty damn lost right now, would it be just a range where we have greater equity than his continuing range?

3) Not a clue, but I feel this will somehow correlate w/our raising range. So I need to figure that out first?

1) itd be a range of hands where each hand in that range had >50% equity against his continuing range. So what hands fit that bill?

3)sorta kinda. the hands we cant raise for value but are still good are certainly in here. But against this villain we probably have great implied odds as well