Villain was 25/7 over 119 hands. Hadn't really noticed him at the table did not have him pegged for a total fish.


PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (5 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

BB ($10)
UTG ($9.54)
MP ($14.66)
Button ($11.34)
Hero (SB) ($17.49)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A, K
1 fold, MP bets $0.20, Button calls $0.20, Hero raises to $0.80, 2 folds, Button calls $0.60

Flop: ($1.90) K, 2, 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $1.20, Button calls $1.20

Turn: ($4.30) 3 (2 players)
Hero bets $2.60, Button calls $2.60

River: ($9.50) 4 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks

Total pot: $9.50 | Rake: $0.43

Preflop my range for villain was 22-TT and some JTs JQs type hands.

His flop calling range i assigned was FD's like JQs JTs, 77-TT, looking back at the hand now in HEM obviously some worse kings KQ KJ although it's less likely as there are 2 exposed. Although during the hand i never included this.

His turn calling range i thought was still mainly underpairs 77-TT or FD's.

Then the river the FD completes and i shit the brick obv versus this range i think b/f is best especially if you add in worse kings. people were clicking it back at me quite a bit during this session so i chose the passive line which i think was a mistake, before i checked i was planning on c/c anything but a shove.

I obviously think b/f is best line here when i bet bet bet a bluff shove is going to look a whole lot less attractive i think and their are plent of hands i am getting value from.

So b/f here yeah?