Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Stat Check - 10NL FR

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1

    Default Stat Check - 10NL FR

    I've played 20,000 hands now at full-ring 10NL. I'm winning at a decent rate (5ptbb/100), but maybe you guys can find some leaks I need to plug based on my stats.

    10NL Full-Ring Stats, 20,000 Hands

    Thanks for taking a look!
    Last edited by NightGizmo; 11-11-2010 at 03:25 PM.
  2. #2
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Can't read any of that
  3. #3
    Sorry about that -- I guess the forum software automatically resizes attached images. You should be able to read it now.
  4. #4
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Might be sample size but I'd 3bet more on the BU. It should be higher than at least CO 3bet% and EP %. I'd cbet a tad more too.
  5. #5
    id be tighter utg and utg +1
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by kmind View Post
    Might be sample size but I'd 3bet more on the BU. It should be higher than at least CO 3bet% and EP %. I'd cbet a tad more too.
    It's not sample size, I definitely need to widen my 3bet range from the button. I'll also look to add a few more cbet opportunities into my game. Thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by philly and the phanatics
    id be tighter utg and utg +1
    Thanks, that's something I was thinking about my stats, too.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    looks familiar. note that you don't need to play LAG to crush micro FR, probably 14-11 is optimal, but not necessarily that fun...

    3 types of advantages, right? positional, card, and skill. Everyone over-estimates skill advantage. Positional and card are far less subjective.

    anyway, i suggest tighter from ep, tighter from mp, increase pfr from button without increasing vpip. 3b less in ep. Steal more from co/bu and less from sb. Stop calling junk from the bb.
  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by kmind View Post
    Might be sample size but I'd 3bet more on the BU. It should be higher than at least CO 3bet% and EP %. I'd cbet a tad more too.
    disagree about the bu stat being too low, and i think its value relative to the rest is sample size biased.
    c-bet looks fine.

    you're probably calling 3bets too often
  9. #9
    looks fine
  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by NightGizmo View Post
    I've played 20,000 hands now at full-ring 10NL. I'm winning at a decent rate (5ptbb/100),
    also, 5ptBB/100 is a respectable winrate, so the tweaks that are being suggested are really only minor and probably not hugely important.
    there are no screaming leaks in your stats, the suggestions i have made are small changes only, and not essential at all
  11. #11
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Quote Originally Posted by daven View Post
    disagree about the bu stat being too low, and i think its value relative to the rest is sample size biased.
    c-bet looks fine.

    you're probably calling 3bets too often
    I was saying 3bet more on the BU compared to CO. Are you saying to 3bet more in the CO??

    Yeah no idea on cbet stat I just assumed it was similar to 6max.
  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by kmind View Post
    I was saying 3bet more on the BU compared to CO. Are you saying to 3bet more in the CO??.
    3b more from bu vs co is true, but i think he is likely to be doing so, and sample size is messing things up (3b stats need big samples to converge) - nothing else in op's stats suggest he's the type to be 3-betting a wider range from co than from bu
  13. #13
    hard to 3bet much at 10nl when everyone just open limps to you and raises only 5% of hands
  14. #14
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Yeah just confused on daven's post...which he was confused on my post...which probably confused OP. Sawwy.
  15. #15
    Flop Cbet is a bit low, SB is too loose and increase your PFR in late position.
    [00:29] <daven> dc, why not check turn behind
    [00:30] <DC> daven
    [00:30] <DC> on my hand?
    [00:30] <daven> yep
    [00:30] <DC> because I am drunk
    [00:30] <daven> nice reason
    [00:30] <daven> no further questions
    [00:30] <yaawn> ^^Lol

    Problem officer...?
  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by daven View Post
    looks familiar. note that you don't need to play LAG to crush micro FR, probably 14-11 is optimal, but not necessarily that fun...

    3 types of advantages, right? positional, card, and skill. Everyone over-estimates skill advantage. Positional and card are far less subjective.

    anyway, i suggest tighter from ep, tighter from mp, increase pfr from button without increasing vpip. 3b less in ep. Steal more from co/bu and less from sb. Stop calling junk from the bb.
    Yes, I know I *could* play tighter to play optimally, but somehow I keep widening up a bit. I definitely need to tighten up my EP ranges, and I'm going to dig deeper into my MP stats to see what hands I should be trimming out.

    Quote Originally Posted by daven
    you're probably calling 3bets too often
    Probably (definitely). Thanks for all the input, it reinforces what I know I should be doing, but somehow keep forgetting at the tables.

    Quote Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
    hard to 3bet much at 10nl when everyone just open limps to you and raises only 5% of hands
    Ha, true! But I think that's offset by the times we 3bet over the fish that like to minraise a wide range of hands.

    Quote Originally Posted by Donachello
    Flop Cbet is a bit low, SB is too loose and increase your PFR in late position.
    I might be calling a little too much from the SB, but most of my SB raises are either from a relatively tight value range or a blatant steal of a nit sitting in the BB. There are a lot of players at 10NL where I can steal with literally any two cards.
  17. #17
    Are you Att. Steal too much in bad positions?

    I have been trying to study spoon's post meticulously and apply it to my game.

    http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...-a-152792.html

    Assumptions i am making:
    You win $0.1333/successful steal
    You lose $0.4/unsuccessful steal
    You fold the flop (i.e. not considering C bet)

    You steal on average 39.47% with an average success rate of 55.58%. If my math is correct you are losing on average 0.7216 ptBB/Att. steal ($0.1443). You would need a success rate of 75% just to be breaking even.
    Last edited by Openside; 11-12-2010 at 01:12 PM.
  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Openside View Post
    Are you Att. Steal too much?

    You steal on average 39.47% with an average success rate of 55.58%. You would need a success rate of 75% just to be breaking even.
    There are a few things to consider:

    1) That 39.47% includes my value range, so my steal range is actually smaller than that. That also means that my success rate needs to be less, because I want them to call with my value range.
    2) Against weak-tight villains, you can complete the steal on the flop by cbetting.
    3) When there are nits in the blinds, my standard raise size is only 3bb from the BTN/SB.

    I'm not sure how my stats compare to others, but if I filter for [ Position = 0 AND Raise First In ], my ptbb/100 is 60. For [ Post Small Blind AND Raise First In ] my win rate is only 1 ptbb/100.

    Finally -- my range completely depends on who is in the blinds. There are some players where I will bet literally any two cards, and on the other extreme there are some players where I only raise for value.
  19. #19
    I just re-read spoon's article and my stat is pretty much inline with what he suggests.

    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow
    Once you get more comfortable and start finding good spots to exploit nits, you can probably get it up to 35%-38% without much trouble, but I would suggest slowly opening up and adding hands to your LP range instead of trying to jump into playing a game that you're not used to.
  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by NightGizmo View Post
    I just re-read spoon's article and my stat is pretty much inline with what he suggests.
    Right on. If not completely implemented, spoon's post is making me think. Like a pendulum i swung from not stealing enough to stealing too much. By too much i mean <30% but in positions where the prob. of the blinds folding to my steal was not profitable.
    In addition to this if im stealing from the CO i think i have to include the prob. of the BU folding too, no?

    Would be nice if we could filter for stealing more accurately.
    Last edited by Openside; 11-12-2010 at 01:44 PM.
  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Openside View Post
    In addition to this if im stealing from the CO i think i have to include the prob. of the BU folding too, no?
    Yes, in fact the button should be your first concern. If the button won't fold, then you're stuck with a double whammy -- you have weak cards AND you are out of position.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •