|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
I mean, forgetting about how the wealth was obtained, I'm not against a dying person being legally permitted to give away their assets to whoever they like. The downside of that is wealth accumulation in rich families. That does suck. But what sucks more is the state saying "your assets aren't actually yours, they're ours and we'll take them back when you die". I have a greater moral problem with that than I do inheritance.
The state taxes us, that is taking wealth from people. I suppose you want to abolish that too? Ok, no more roads, etc.
And I don't have a problem with inheritance in principle. I have a problem with the royal family getting £100m a year of our money to walk around being useless.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
Of course, where the wealth has been obtained by historically questionable methods, it's a different debate, but that's a matter for courts, not something I'm going to concern myself about because it's politicised and subject to misinformation and propaganda, it's a can of worms I don't care to open. Pretty much every country in the world has something in their history to be ashamed of. There are bigger problems with the RF than their history, such as protecting nonces today.
Fine, let them keep some of their property. But stop giving them grants and tell them they have to earn a living like the rest of us. And pay taxes like the rest of us.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
Poop, do you really think classism isn't a thing in Europe? France certainly has class issues, that's a civilised republic isn't it?
I haven't lived in Europe, but I doubt it is an issue the way it is here. My postdoc is French, and she says class is not a thing in France the way it is here. That's what happens when you abolish the monarcy. In Canada and the US (where I have lived), no-one talks about what class a person is. It just isn't a thing.
And I know for a fact that class has been historically a bigger issue here than in Germany, France, and Italy.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
The only way to remove class from society is if there is income equality,
Class and income inequality are related, but they're not the same thing. You've never lived anywhere else, so you don't get it.
I know a fellow prof who has a bug up his ass because he comes from a working class family. Nobody where I'm from would give a shit, they'd just say 'so what?'. But he brings it up all the time and so obviously it's a big thing here.
Even the language you use here. People use the words 'working class', 'middle class', 'upper class', all the time when they talk about politics. So again, obviously it's a big thing.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
but why the fuck should I get paid the same as a doctor?
I think you're confusing me with a communist. I never said everyone should earn the same amount. It should just be less disparate, like in Scandinavia (or Canada for that matter). And you shouldn't have a whole group of aristocrats who's biggest contribution to the world is say "pwahhh!" and riding around on horses and shooting foxes. Fuck off.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
Social discrimination (as opposed institutional discrimination) is kind of inevitable in free market societies. People tend to socialise with those on relatively equal financial footing.
It doesn't have to be as gross as it is (income inequality).
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
If a society is classless, it surely has bigger problems.
Like what?
|